雷哥网GMAT-【OG20-P794-807题】Not trusting themselves to choose wisely among the_OG17新题

雷哥网GMAT>题库>OG17新题>句子改错SC >14224

句子改错SC-14224 【难度:650-680】 Time Cost00:00

报告题目错误

请选择错误类型：

请描述一下这个错误：

取消

建议使用官方纸质指南，查看对照完整题目

【OG20-P794-807题】

Not trusting themselves to choose wisely among the wide array of investment opportunities on the market, stockbrokers are helping many people who turn to them to buy stocks that could be easily bought directly.

A

stockbrokers are helping many people who turn to them to buy stocks that could be easily
分析A选项
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

B

stockbrokers are helping many people who are turning to them for help in buying stocks that they could easily have
分析B选项
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

C

many people are turning to stockbrokers for help from them to buy stocks that could be easily
分析C选项
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

D

many people are turning to stockbrokers for help to buy stocks that easily could have been
分析D选项
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

E

many people are turning to stockbrokers for help in buying stocks that could easily be
分析E选项
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

该题平均耗时：1m26s ，平均正确率：69%。该题由网友QkhHVw1提供。更多GMAT题目请

网友解析

暂无雷哥网文字解析

预约讲师一对一题目解析课程

当前版本由 216505pr 更新于2021-11-19 16:05:37 感谢由 216505pr 对此题目的解答所做出的贡献。

短语放句首，要求逻辑主语可以发出该动作，不是股票经纪人们不相信自己，而是many people，所以排除AB；help sb in doing sth，在某方面帮助某人，E是比较好的答案；D选项，have been错，并不表示完成状态或者过去发生，现在仍在继续。

题目讨论（10条评论）

提交

吃着香蕉开跑车

选E
A 主语错误，不相信自己的应是many people，不是stockbrokers。
B主语错误，不相信自己的应是many people，不是stockbrokers。
C for help from them冗长啰嗦。
D 时态错误，不用have been。
E正确

0 0 回复 2021-05-08 16:35:56
161898ppvg

D 目的是让经理人去买那些他们could 已经买了 E在那些他们可以直接购买的stock上决定买哪儿个

2 0 回复 2021-03-28 14:00:52
小黑皮

turning to somebody for help, 这里的help是名词，后面具体帮什么用in 。。

0 0 回复 2021-01-27 04:41:49

623079v

D错E对的原因: 1. turn sb for help这里help是noun 所以应该用in doing 比to do 更合适(但我自己觉得用这个来判断还是有点模糊)；2. could have been和could be的问题是硬性错误，分词/情态动词里面加have e.g. having done, could have done强调先时性，但买股票和委托stockbroker之间其实并不需要一个明显的先后关系，”The point is not that people are turning to stockbrokers for help in buying stocks that at some earlier time could have been bought directly, but rather that the stocks could be bought by the people directly at the very time they are seeking help from the stockbrokers.“，用could have been在句意上不合理，这边的could be应该是虚拟语态(?)，如果有错误请指出；3. easily的位置也是一个硬性错误: D中的easily没有紧跟been brought就很奇怪，要离修饰词更近一点比较好

0 回复 2020-12-03 14:46:50

全智贤

所以could be easily和could easily be是都可以的嘛？？？纠结了好久

2 0 回复 2020-10-09 18:27:17
挣扎的Zack

有个问题，could have done不是应该理解为“本应该”嘛？所以D选项应该是“帮助买到本应该直接买入的股票”吧？

0 0 回复 2020-08-27 15:13:44
杀鸡w回复挣扎的Zack

could have done有可能做，但没做成的意思；而原文没有这种意思

2 0 回复 2020-09-21 19:57:31
septcam

Dustin: 副词放在be动词，助动词之后放在形容词，一般动词之前

0 0 回复 2020-07-29 16:05:15
232235v回复septcam

那E就不对了

0 0 回复 2020-11-25 14:14:03
IAMEloise

个人认为，首先，容易买，easily是修饰being bought的； D that easily could be...中的easily离需要修饰的being bought比较远，感觉更像是强调可能性/easily修饰could/；而that could easily be...则是说明后面的场景容易出现/easily修饰后面的事情being bought/，easily修饰语离被修饰对象更近，也更符合intended meaning。

0 0 回复 2019-12-06 02:00:53
IAMEloise回复IAMEloise

更正一下 be bought directly

0 0 回复 2019-12-06 02:13:56
小馄吞

这里的help是名词help do sth和 help to do都不对

0 0 回复 2019-10-17 21:20:25
210

原文逻辑不合理；不能是stockholders不相信自己还去帮助别人；排除AB 。B中的have 改变原文的意思 C from them 指代不清晰；且多余 D have been时态改变逻辑改变错误

0 0 回复 2019-09-19 10:46:34