建议使用官方纸质指南,查看对照完整题目
It is an odd but indisputable fact that the seventeenth-century English women who are generally regarded as among the forerunners of modern feminism are almost all identified with the Royalist side in the conflict between Royalists and Parliamentarians known as the English Civil Wars. Since Royalist ideology is often associated with the radical patriarchalism of seventeenthcentury political theorist Robert Filmer—a patriarchalism that equates family and kingdom and asserts the divinely ordained absolute power of the king and, by analogy, of the male head of the household—historians have been understandably puzzled by the fact that Royalist women wrote the earliest extended criticisms of the absolute subordination of women in marriage and the earliest systematic assertions of women’s rational and moral equality with men. Some historians have questioned the facile equation of Royalist ideology with Filmerian patriarchalism; and indeed, there may have been no consistent differences between Royalists and Parliamentarians on issues of family organization and women’s political rights, but in that case one would expect early feminists to be equally divided between the two sides.
Catherine Gallagher argues that Royalism engendered feminism because the ideology of absolute monarchy provided a transition to an ideology of the absolute self. She cites the example of the notoriously eccentric author Margaret Cavendish (1626–1673), duchess of Newcastle. Cavendish claimed to be as ambitious as any woman could be, but knowing that as a woman she was excluded from the pursuit of power in the real world, she resolved to be mistress of her own world, the “immaterial world” that any person can create within her own mind—and, as a writer, on paper. In proclaiming what she called her “singularity,” Cavendish insisted that she was a self-sufficient being within her mental empire, the center of her own subjective universe rather than a satellite orbiting a dominant male planet. In justifying this absolute singularity, Cavendish repeatedly invoked the model of the absolute monarch, a figure that became a metaphor for the self-enclosed, autonomous nature of the individual person. Cavendish’s successors among early feminists retained her notion of woman’s sovereign self, but they also sought to break free from the complete political and social isolation that her absolute singularity entailed.
【OG20-P443-563题】
The primary purpose of the passage is to
-
分析A选项xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-
分析B选项xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-
分析C选项xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-
分析D选项xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-
分析E选项xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx



文章结构:
第一段:提出困惑:在英国的内战中,feminist是支持royalist 的。
解释为什么有这样的困惑:因为feminist与royalist的理念是完全不同的。
第二段:CG的例子,说明为什么royalist是会促进feminist的产生的
A trace the historical roots of a modern sociopolitical movement
文章解释了一个Odd 的事实,没有追溯一个社会政治时间的根源是什么
B present one scholar’s explanation for a puzzling historical phenomenon
符合结构
C contrast two interpretations of the ideological origins of a political conflict
无涉及到两种不同的 interpretations的对比
D establish a link between the ideology of an influential political theorist and that of a notoriously eccentric writer
无涉及establish a link
E call attention to some points of agreement between opposing sides in an ideological debate
ideological debate无涉及
题目讨论 (10条评论)

-
228735bia
矛盾:早期的女权主义者通常被归为保皇派——和保皇派宗族社会理念不符 解释:女权主义者在保皇派和议会派都有
0
0 回复 2022-11-07 10:55:47
-
wordy要你吗
这句话没读懂,分享一下:4. and indeed, there may have been no consistent differences between Royalists and Parliamentarians on issues of family organization and women’s political rights, but in that case one would expect early feminists to be equally divided between the two sides. 议会党和保皇派可能(在女权问题上)没有一致分歧,但这种情况下女权就应该在两党相同多(而不是前面说的女权多保皇派)
0
0 回复 2022-08-26 11:35:50
-
谭曹睿
这题目绝对不可能只650-680...
1
0 回复 2022-02-02 16:47:51
-
谭曹睿回复谭曹睿
这文章,打错
0
0 回复 2022-02-02 16:48:36
-
-
Ms Eh
第一段讲的是一种puzzling historical phenomenon,因为Royalist原本应该主张父权,结果女性代表们却想反对歧视追求平等。 第二段CG这个人搬出了Cavendish来证明自己的观点-Royalist催生了feminism,因为他们都提倡绝对的自我中心主义。
1
0 回复 2020-12-17 14:46:27
-
Mariposa爱学习
E:call attention to some points of agreement between opposing sides in an ideological debate 唤起注意:一个意识形态争论中的两个对立方的一些共同点 但文章讨论的是保皇派的意识形态与宗法制的关系--两个意识形态的关系 “Some historians have questioned the facile equation of Royalist ideology with Filmerian patriarchalism”
2
0 回复 2020-11-15 18:14:26
-
Mariposa爱学习回复Mariposa爱学习
facile 未经深思熟虑的
0
0 回复 2020-11-15 18:15:41
-
-
xixixtx
engender看成endanger也是没谁了
4
0 回复 2019-12-12 11:32:47
-
Tancey
这篇文章也太难了吧555555
3
0 回复 2019-10-30 20:13:20
-
浪逐曲奇
这是个问题解决型文章。A不对,其实没有在对女权运动追根溯源,文章第一段第一句就明显得告诉我它接下来要干什么了
0
0 回复 2019-08-24 19:18:34
-
小爱奈
D的格局太小了
1
0 回复 2018-08-03 22:52:29
-
hyalinestar
b:one scholar 指的是?
0
0 回复 2018-03-30 15:44:08
-
may翠回复hyalinestar
Catherine Gallagher
0
0 回复 2018-08-18 14:47:10
-