中间图

Or
icon
OG20官方指南,建议同学们刷3遍。第一遍做题了解题型和考点,第二遍精刷,第三遍集中解决疑难问题。建议考生第一遍刷题采用官方正版纸质书籍,若遇到疑难问题,欢迎在此专区查阅解析,提供解析,参与题目讨论,与所有考生一起解决疑难问题。
阅读RC-14305 (第1/7题) Time Cost00:00
收藏
该题平均耗时:4m57s,平均正确率:50%

建议使用官方纸质指南,查看对照完整题目

Jacob Burckhardt’s view that Renaissance European women “stood on a footing of perfect equality” with Renaissance men has been repeatedly cited by feminist scholars as a prelude to their presentation of rich historical evidence of women’s inequality. In striking contrast to Burckhardt, Joan Kelly in her famous 1977 essay, “Did Women Have a Renaissance?” argued that the Renaissance was a period of economic and social decline for women relative both to Renaissance men and to medieval women. Recently, however, a significant trend among feminist scholars has entailed a rejection of both Kelly’s dark vision of the Renaissance and Burckhardt’s rosy one. Many recent works by these scholars stress the ways in which differences among Renaissance women—especially in terms of social status and religion—work to complicate the kinds of generalizations both Burckhardt and Kelly made on the basis of their observations about upper-class Italian women.

The trend is also evident, however, in works focusing on those middle- and upper-class European women whose ability to write gives them disproportionate representation in the historical record. Such women were, simply by virtue of their literacy, members of a tiny minority of the population, so it is risky to take their descriptions of their experiences as typical of “female experience” in any general sense. Tina Krontiris, for example, in her fascinating study of six Renaissance women writers, does tend at times to conflate “women” and “women writers,” assuming that women’s gender, irrespective of other social differences, including literacy, allows us to view women as a homogeneous social group and make that group an object of analysis. Nonetheless, Krontiris makes a significant contribution to the field and is representative of those authors who offer what might be called a cautiously optimistic assessment of Renaissance women’s achievements, although she also stresses the social obstacles Renaissance women faced when they sought to raise their “oppositional voices.” Krontiris is concerned to show women intentionally negotiating some power for themselves (at least in the realm of public discourse) against potentially constraining ideologies, but in her sober and thoughtful concluding remarks, she suggests that such verbal opposition to cultural stereotypes was highly circumscribed; women seldom attacked the basic assumptions in the ideologies that oppressed them.

【OG20-P456-596题】

The author of the passage discusses Krontiris primarily to provide an example of a writer who

  • 分析A选项
    xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • 分析B选项
    xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • 分析C选项
    xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • 分析D选项
    xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • 分析E选项
    xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
该题目由网友RD6LoS提供。更多GMAT题目请
暂无雷哥网文字解析
当前版本由 Alinaaa 更新于2021-07-13 23:17:37 感谢由 Alinaaa 对此题目的解答所做出的贡献。

逻辑图:
JB认为文艺复兴男女平等。
JK认为文艺复兴女性在经济和社会地位上下降,相对于文艺复兴男性和中世纪女性。反对JB。
Trend反对JB和JK。
Trend关注中上层欧洲女性。这种女性是人口的一小部分,所以以偏概全是有风险的。举例,TK conflate女性和女性作家,认为无关社会地位,把女性就看做一个整体来研究。
然而,TK做出了贡献,是积极评价文艺复兴女性成就的代表。尽管她也强调了文艺复兴女性发出反对声音时,所面临的社会障碍。
TK在作品中有展现,女性有意图地捍卫自己的权利,这种权利与ideologist所倡导的相反。但是,她认为这种反对是被高度回避的。女性很少攻击ideologist的基本假设。

题目:
关键:文中有3个观点,JB、JK、Trend(TK属于trend的例子)。所以D正确,TK一定是反对JB和JK的。
A TK非常批评文艺复兴女性的writing。回文定位,TK有肯定,且积极评价。与原文信息不符,错误。
B TK同意JK。与原文信息不符,错误。
C TK误解了文艺复兴女性的作品。NM(not mention)
E TK根据很多社会和宗教内容,来研究文艺复兴女性。NM


题目讨论 10条评论)

用户头像
提交
  • 用户头像

    474700rock

    The first paragraph introduces a trend: "Recently, however, a significant trend among feminist scholars has entailed a rejection of both Kelly’s dark vision of the Renaissance and Burckhardt’s rosy one". The second paragraph takes it forward and provides an example of Tina Krontiris. ---------------------------------------------
    A.is highly critical of the writings of certain Renaissance women - Krontiris is not highly critical of Renaissance women
    B.supports Kelly’s view of women’s status during the Renaissance - Incorrect - TK rejects Kelly's view
    C.has misinterpreted the works of certain Renaissance women - Incorrect - TK has not misinterpreted the works. His work focused only on a certain class of women who were literate.
    D.has rejected the views of both Burckhardt and Kelly - Correct
    E.has studied Renaissance women in a wide variety of social and religious contexts - Incorrect - The passage does not state this.
    0 0 回复 2022-01-07 20:19:25
  • 用户头像

    旮旮

    对女性态度的不同:
    B的态度是完全乐观;Kelly的态度是完全悲观;Krontiris的态度是cautiously optimistic,即提到了女性作出的一些contribution,也说了现实的obstacles,所以对前两者的态度都是反对的;
    0 0 回复 2021-10-17 17:01:59
  • 用户头像

    632530aeusq

    A的官方解释:The passage suggests that K uses the Renaissance women writers' works as historical evidence, not that she offered any criticisim of the works themselves
    0 0 回复 2021-10-16 12:06:53
  • 用户头像

    VanessaH

    怎么读都觉得TK和JB JK一个类型,都是以upper class 代表了整个群体,真就看不出哪里oppose了
    0 0 回复 2021-06-16 16:39:11
  • 用户头像

    188449krlzf

    这正确率也是绝了
    3 0 回复 2021-03-28 11:32:23
  • 用户头像

    Mariposa爱学习

    文章逻辑:
    第一段:JB-文艺复兴时期女性与男性完全平等-女性学者引用JB观点-女性不平等历史证据 prelude前奏
                JK-文艺复兴时期女性地位衰退
                rencent trend-强调女性之间差异-基于JB、JK对意大利上流社会女性的观察
    第二段:trend-中上层女性的作品-disproportionate representation-不具有典型性
                比如TK-6个女性作家代表当时全部女性
                TK-作出显著贡献-代表cautiously optimistic作家-强调当时女性面对很多约束-女性很少攻击压迫她们的基础意
                形态
    TK是一个典型的,用上流社会女性作家的作品代表当时女性历史,以偏概全的作家;位于trend那个层次,作用是支持trend
    0 0 回复 2020-11-15 16:21:00
  • 用户头像

    Audreyrey

    文章逻辑:
    JB认为女性被平等对待;JK认为decline了;新的趋势认为他俩的都不对。
    新的趋势有两个点:1.定义女性是否平等的方式有很多种(E选项出现在此处,排除);2.有能力写作的女人被历史更多记载。
    举例Krontiris。
    0 0 回复 2020-11-02 23:39:54
  • 用户头像

    一只大鲨鱼

    首次定位KR的位置,for example那里。为什么举例?则前面肯定有观点:recently,a trend rejection of both B and Ke
    0 0 回复 2020-03-08 09:34:05
  • 用户头像

    LoveGood

    我更倾向于本文有四种观点的:1)JB---rosy version 2)JK---dark version 3)feminist scholars主要关注在generalizations错误上, 其中又包含了两派:JB JK只研究Upper class和第二段开头的works研究upper&middle 同样都忽略了下层广大女性 4)借此引出Tina, 坏的方面是也从某种程度上犯了generlization的错,好的方面是cautiously optimistic. 
    非常同意评论中:“没有考虑女作家的社会地位是高于一般女性的”
    所以第一题D选项可以看出Tina既不是JB的rosy,也没有JK的dark--->correct one.
    0 0 回复 2019-12-27 20:32:13
    • 评论用户头像

      LoveGood回复 LoveGood

      非常同意评论中:“没有考虑女作家的社会地位是高于一般女性的” 第五题正确选项A印证了这句话。

      0 0 回复 2019-12-27 20:46:23

  • 用户头像

    wsysnbb

    886
    0 0 回复 2019-10-06 03:19:45
  • 手机注册
  • 邮箱注册
登录>







关闭图标

标题图

  • 图标

    知识库学习

    GMAT语法、逻辑、阅读、数学各单项备考知识点学习及测验
  • 图标

    在线做题

    包含GMAT各单项必考知识点题目、OG/PREP/GWD/雷哥讲义题目、难度650/680/700/730题库题目练习及题目解析
  • 图标

    在线模考

    语文套题/数学套题/全套仿真模考,包含GWD/PERP/精选模考等上百套套题模考
  • 图标

    在线测评

    适合5种不同基础的GMAT学员,测评后可自动出具分数报告及复习计划指导
  • 图标

    资料下载

    GMAT必备备考资料下载、鸡精下载、课程课件等免费下载
  • 图标

    课程学习

    注册会员后,可在GMAT课程区,选择免费直播课程及公开课程进行在线学习
×
请你选择你要查看的模考成绩单
立即开通 暂不开通
加载图片
网络异常