【OG20-P409-480题】The passage suggests that the opposition to banks _OG17新题_-{$seo

阅读RC-14675 (第4/5题)

报告题目错误

请选择错误类型：

请描述一下这个错误：

取消

建议使用官方纸质指南，查看对照完整题目

Historians remain divided over the role of banks in facilitating economic growth in the United States in the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries. Some scholars contend that banks played a minor role in the nation's growing economy. Financial institutions, they argue, appeared only after the economy had begun to develop, and once organized, followed conservative lending practices, providing aid to established commercial enterprises but shunning those, such as manufacturing and transportation projects, that were more uncertain and capital-intensive (i.e., requiring greater expenditures in the form of capital than in labor).

A growing number of historians argue, in contrast, that banks were crucial in transforming the early national economy. When state legislatures began granting more bank charters in the 1790s and early 1800s, the supply of credit rose accordingly. Unlike the earliest banks, which had primarily provided short-term loans to well-connected merchants, the banks of the early nineteenth century issued credit widely. As Paul Gilje asserts, the expansion and democratization of credit in the early nineteenth century became the driving force of the American economy, as banks began furnishing large amounts of capital to transportation and industrial enterprises. The exception, such historians argue, was in the South; here, the overwhelmingly agrarian nature of the economy generated outright opposition to banks, which were seen as monopolistic institutions controlled by an elite group of planters.

【OG20-P409-480题】

The passage suggests that the opposition to banks in the South in the early nineteenth century stemmed in part from the perception that banks

A

did not benefit more than a small minority of the people 分析A选项
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
B

did not support the interests of elite planters 分析B选项
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
C

were too closely tied to transportation and industrial interests 分析C选项
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
D

were unwilling to issue the long-term loans required by agrarian interests 分析D选项
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
E

were too willing to lend credit widely 分析E选项
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

网友解析

暂无雷哥网文字解析

当前版本由 Edward. 更新于2021-04-15 11:51:59 感谢由 Edward. 对此题目的解答所做出的贡献。

细节题

A：这类银行被视为种植园主的垄断机构，除了他们其他人无法受益

B：与文章相反

C：没有提到银行和这两个行业的关系

D：没提到

E：不属于这类银行的特点

题目讨论（7条评论）

提交

499685skw

it was controlled by elite group -- doesn't mean it was support elite's interest 所以不选B

0 0 回复 2022-09-02 18:58:17

贾思敏

积累：stem in part from...部分来源于...

题型：suggests 推理题

层次：the opposition to banks in the South 在南方对银行的反对（第二段的最后一部分）

相关观点（回文定位）：here, the overwhelmingly agrarian nature of the economy generated outright opposition to banks, which were seen as monopolistic institutions controlled by an elite group of planters.
关键词：agrarian nature、banks是monopolistic institutions controlled by an elite group of planters由精英种植园主控制的垄断机构

直接定位选项就是A：只惠及a small minority of the people 对应controlled by an elite group of planters

这道题我眼瞎了选了D：issue the long-term loans这根本就不是同一个层次的，层次不分

B：did not support the interests of elite planters 方向相反了，人家就是support 这些elite planters

C：transportation and industrial interests这个是上一段提及的，层次不分

E：lend credit widely也是第二段第二部分提及的，层次不分

0 回复 2021-09-29 23:46:30

Mariposa爱学习

here, the overwhelmingly agrarian nature of the economy generated outright opposition to banks, which were seen as monopolistic institutions controlled by an elite group of planters. 读的时候把which指代搞混了就是说南方以农业经济为主导，肯定有很多中产甚至很穷的农民（结合美国历史），他们觉得银行是站在那些大农场主的那边的，所以反对银行。

0 0 回复 2020-11-15 14:17:38
1032158tlhga回复Mariposa爱学习

同错，把which看成是指代农业性质的经济，但通过which后面的were可以判断指代的是banks；或者通过monopolistic institutions意思判断指代的是banks

0 0 回复 2020-12-05 11:21:42
847716opn

定位错误，在文章的最后一句话

0 0 回复 2019-10-04 21:22:38

730最后的机会

这个有点绕啊，这句话要看懂，
The  exception, such historians argue, was in the South; here, the overwhelmingly agrarian nature of-the economy generated outright opposition to banks, which were seen as monopolistic institutions controlled by an elite group of planters.这句要看明白，翻译过来：如H所argue的，南方是个例外；种植园经济的本质使得产生了与银行完全的对立，（which代指Banks）银行在这里被看做被精英团体控制的垄断组织。
题目：he opposition to banks in the South in the early nineteenth century stemmed in part from the perception that banks简单来说就是：这种对立的银行是由什么引起或源于什么？
根据原文可知，南方的银行是被少数精英团体控制（由此引起的opposition），则可以得出答案A

0 回复 2018-07-12 12:28:02

花花iashin

哪位大神能帮助解释一下A选项 did not benefit more than a small minority of the people ，这里的more than怎么理解呀？

0 0 回复 2017-11-24 15:40:22
轩娅回复花花iashin

没有有益于比小部分人更多的人。more than修饰的是后面a small minority of the people.（不知道有没有解决你的疑惑...）

0 0 回复 2017-12-18 15:10:39

花花iashin回复轩娅

谢谢明白了

0 0 回复 2017-12-18 19:55:11

xz回复花花iashin

除去精英人士，其他人没有受益

1 0 回复 2018-01-17 06:27:20
Natasha

题干KW：opposition to banks in the South（推断题）
定位：第二结构第3层次

错误答案特征：
B. not support the interests of elite planters 与文章逻辑方向相反
C. transportation and industrial interests.层次未提及
D. long-term loans 层次未提及
E. lend credit widely层次定位混淆

正确选项特征：
A.是原文第二结构第3层次的同义转换
(3) The exception, such historians argue, was in the South; here, the overwhelmingly agrarian nature of-the economy generated outright opposition to banks, which were seen as monopolistic institutions controlled by an elite group of planters.

0 0 回复 2016-09-20 11:56:49