分享建议使用官方纸质指南，查看对照完整题目
During the 1980s, many economic historians studying Latin America focused on the impact of the Great Depression of the 1930s. Most of these historians argued that although the Depression began earlier in Latin America than in the United States, it was less severe in Latin America and did not significantly impede industrial growth there. The historians' argument was grounded in national government records concerning tax revenues and exports and in government-sponsored industrial censuses, from which historians have drawn conclusions about total manufacturing output and profit levels across Latin America. However, economic statistics published by Latin American governments in the early twentieth century are neither reliable nor consistent; this is especially true of manufacturing data, which were gathered from factory owners for taxation purposes and which therefore may well be distorted. Moreover, one cannot assume a direct correlation between the output level and the profit level of a given industry as these variables often move in opposite directions. Finally, national and regional economies are composed of individual firms and industries, and relying on general, sweeping economic indicators may mask substantial variations among these different enterprises. For example, recent analyses of previously unexamined data on textile manufacturing in Brazil and Mexico suggest that the Great Depression had a more severe impact on this Latin American industry than scholars had recognized.
【OG20-P435-545题】
Which of the following, if true, would most strengthen the author's assertion regarding economic indicators in highlight text?
-
分析A选项
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -
分析B选项
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-
分析C选项
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-
分析D选项
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-
分析E选项
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- 网友解析
我有更好的解析 
暂无雷哥网文字解析
题干KW：（增强题）most strengthen
定位：定位到第一结构第5层次
错误答案特征：
A. 只提到了一个产业的profit 和output 没有涉及到indicator的作用
C. 范围不对 indicator的作用是在同一个国家或者同一个区域模糊了各个行业的差距。 选项涉及到多个国家。
D. 未提及各个industries 或enterprise的区别
E. 范围不对 indicator的作用是在同一个国家或者同一个区域模糊了各个行业的差距。 选项涉及到多个国家。
正确选项特征：
B. During a national economic recession, United States microchips manufacturers’ profits rise sharply while United States steel manufacturers' profits plunge. 符合原文
（5） Finally, national and regional economies are composed of individual firms and industries, and relying on general, sweeping economic indicators may mask substantial variations among these different enterprises.
题目讨论 （8条评论）
-
201161gnxuf
原文定位其实是要找一定区域内 不同的企业之间的不同，答案要满足首先企业是不同的，然后是有一个国家或者是region范围来做限定，只有B满足，C说的其实是不同区域内的同一类企业 E说的是多个区域内的同一种企业
0
0
回复
2023-03-15 14:13:44
-
有名字
profits plunge利润暴跌
0
0
回复
2021-11-02 16:22:00
-
samelany
highlight句往前看：national and regional economies.... 讨论范围是同个国家；different enterprises表明不同企业，选项范围就出来了
0
0
回复
2021-10-02 18:47:15
-
358172hsa
我实在搞不明白， regional economies 也可以是一个大的范围比如说拉丁美洲也是一个地区啊； different enterprises 也可以是指不同的公司，没有说一定是 different industries；
0
0
回复
2021-01-23 01:06:17
-
7Sabrina回复358172hsa
是national 不是international
0
0
回复
2021-03-24 17:56:15
-
-
Mariposa爱学习
sweeping economic indicators may mask substantial variations among these different enterprises 个体公司和个体行业组成了整体国家或地区经济 这种全面的经济指标往往会掩盖个体公司之间巨大差异 要求答案对比的两个主体必须都是个体公司
0
0
回复
2020-11-15 11:59:36
-
Mariposa爱学习回复Mariposa爱学习
不同的公司，不能是同行业的
0
0
回复
2020-11-15 12:00:34
-
-
六日
among different industries！！！
0
0
回复
2019-12-01 22:59:19
-
Crystal
直接找这个点，同一个国家或者同一个区域，掩盖各个行业的差距
2
0
回复
2017-11-22 22:33:05
-
豆沙山
可是这里不是在说latin American industry嘛 然后就选了唯一有Mexico和Brazil的C...哭哭
2
0
回复
2017-09-20 20:25:46
周末、晚班滚动开班 
24+35+35+6课时 
