leon小恶魔

Moreover, since customers understand a restaurant’s product and know what to anticipate in terms of service, they are empowered to question its quality.

0 0 回复 2022-05-02 15:56:00

274177qov

为什么不是这句呢 For lower-priced restaurants,where one expects less assiduous service

0 0 回复 2021-10-21 20:22:16

贾思敏

题型：inferred 推理题
推理的内容：作者视角下的the appeal of service guarantees to customers

A. since customers understand a restaurant’s product and know what to anticipate in terms of service, they are empowered to question its quality. This is not generally true in the case of skilled activities such as electrical work, where, consequently, a guarantee might have greater customer appeal.由于客户了解餐厅的产品并知道在服务方面应该期待什么，因此他们有权质疑其质量。 在skilled activities such as electrical work的情况下，通常情况并非如此，因此，保证可能对客户具有更大的吸引力。-》所以，不是more appealing to customers of restaurants than to customers of other businesses，而是对于其他skilled activities such as electrical work就是有更大的吸引力，应该是less appealing...than...other business才对，方向相反。

B. since customers understand a restaurant’s product and know what to anticipate in terms of service, they are empowered to question its quality 正因为知道anticipate in terms of service，才会更加觉得有权去质疑他们的质量问题，而不是more appealing更有吸引力，方向相反。

C. 还是B选线提到原文那句，因为是empowered to question its quality所以才是less appealing。

D. offering a guarantee increases the likelihood of customer selection, probably reflecting the greater financial commitment involved in choosing an expensive restaurant. 所以a service guarantee is not likely to be very appealing错，方向相反。

E. ① a business is worried about its service不是在a high level of customer service的，而是在For lower-priced restaurants ②关于 a business is worried about its service这个观点是Tucci and Talaga的视角，不是author的视角，视角错误，张冠李戴。

1 0 回复 2021-09-27 16:49:24

朋友醒醒

since customers understand a restaurant’s product and know what to anticipate in terms of service, they are empowered to question its quality

0 0 回复 2021-09-14 00:21:30

一只大鲨鱼

答案E选项解析错的，应该是把低层次店的理论按到高层次店了，犯了张冠李戴的错误

1 0 回复 2020-03-18 10:12:10

Joyce L

appeal 有吸引力，申述，呼吁；和投诉不是一回事

0 0 回复 2019-08-10 01:12:22

卢不图

题目是appeal to customers定位与第一段的2/3/4层次
A other business未提及，且为无关比较
B 注意到anticipate定位第一段第4个层次 ，原文是 they are empowered to question its quality，质疑，而不是more appealing，与原文逻辑相反
C  customers understand（knowledge） a restaurant’s（business） product and know what to anticipate in terms of service，第一段第4层次，原文的同一转换
D 看到high level of financial commitment，定位第一段第2层次，原文 increases the likelihood of customer selection, 选项is not likely to be very appealing，逻辑反
E 看到customers think that a business is worried about its service.定位第一段4层次，但是这是承接lower-priced restaurants,where one expects less assiduous service，顾客不期待刻苦的服务，选项 where customers expect a high level of customer service，逻辑相反。

4 0 回复 2018-12-16 16:25:18

桃太郎西红柿

虽然是推理题，但是不妨从主旨和细节两个方面来切入进而做出综合判断。
主旨：作者开篇question这个guarantee的作用，即有时候是less appealing的（题干问的是作者agree的内容，从而排掉A,B）
细节定位：Moreover, since customers understand a restaurant’s product and know what to anticipate in terms of service, they are empowered to question its quality. 

understand a restaurant’s product and know what to anticipate in terms of service=C中的are knowledgeable about a business’s product or service.没有违背原文，选C

D说反了，E用便宜的店来说贵的店

0 0 回复 2017-10-20 11:51:55

百香果蜂蜜茶

从题干中的infer可以看出这是一道推论题，正确答案是C。 A选项，Such guarantees are likely to be somewhat more appealing to customers，说更加吸引顾客，说反了。 B选项，同A一样说是更加吸引顾客，反了，排除。 C，正确。 D选项，a service guarantee is not likely to be very appealing过分无依据推理，是吸引力变弱，而不是不再是一个吸引了。 E选项，过分无依据推理，错误。

0 0 回复 2017-08-10 11:56:24

百香果蜂蜜茶

从题干中的infer可以看出这是一道推论题，正确答案是C。
A选项，Such guarantees are likely to be somewhat more appealing to customers，说更加吸引顾客，说反了。
B选项，同A一样说是更加吸引顾客，反了，排除。
C，正确。
D选项，a service guarantee is not likely to be very appealing过分无依据推理，是吸引力变弱，而不是不再是一个吸引了。
E选项，过分无依据推理，错误。

0 0 回复 2017-08-10 11:49:31