雷哥网GMAT-【OG20-P576-657题】Economist: Tropicorp, which constantly seeks profi_OG19新题

雷哥网GMAT>题库>OG19新题>逻辑CR >16771

逻辑CR-16771 【难度:650-680】 Time Cost00:00

报告题目错误

请选择错误类型：

请描述一下这个错误：

取消

建议使用官方纸质指南，查看对照完整题目

【OG20-P576-657题】

Economist: Tropicorp, which constantly seeks profitable investment opportunities, has been buying and clearing sections of tropical forest for cattle ranching, although pastures newly created there become useless for grazing after just a few years. The company has not gone into rubber tapping, even though greater profits can be made from rubber tapping, which leaves the forest intact. Thus, some environmentalists argue that Tropicorp’s actions do not serve even its own economic interest. However, the initial investment required for a successful rubber-tapping operation is larger than that needed for a cattle ranch; there is a shortage of workers employable in rubber-tapping operations;and taxes are higher on profits from rubber tapping than on profits from cattle ranching.

Consequently, the environmentalists’ conclusion is probably wrong.

In the economist’s argument, the two boldface portions play which of the following roles?

A

The first supports the conclusion of the economist’s argument; the second calls that conclusion into question
分析A选项
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

B

The first states the conclusion of the economist’s argument; the second supports that conclusion
分析B选项
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

C

The first supports the conclusion of the environmentalists’ argument; the second states that conclusion
分析C选项
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

D

The first states the conclusion of the environmentalists’ argument; the second states the conclusion of the economist’s argument
分析D选项
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

E

Each supports the conclusion of the economist’s argument
分析E选项
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

该题平均耗时：1m58s ，平均正确率：73.6%。该题由网友hlE4i5F提供。更多GMAT题目请

网友解析

暂无雷哥网文字解析

预约讲师一对一题目解析课程

当前版本由 285452zdsb 更新于2021-04-24 16:05:11 感谢由 285452zdsb 对此题目的解答所做出的贡献。

题型：boldface

原文大意：Thus+BF1+however+consequently+BF2

逻辑链：第一段前面的Thus说明第一段是对前文的一个结论，且是environmentalists的argument，后面however表示转折，第二段的consequently带领了另一个结论，说第一段environmentalists的结论不对。

选项解析：

A. 第一段支持了经济学家的结论，第二段质疑了这个结论。第一段不是经济学家的结论，是环境学家的结论，排除

B. 第一段论述了经济学家的结论，第二段支持了这个结论。第一段不是经济学家的结论，排除

C. 第一段支持了环境学家的结论，第二段论述了那个结论。第一段没有支持，本身就是结论，排除

D. 第一段论述了环境学家的结论，第二段论述了经济学家的结论。正确

E. 每段都支持了经济学家的结论。两个都不是支持，都本身就是结论，排除

题目讨论（10条评论）

提交

660976qkft

thus, ... : con 1 环境学家的 consequently: 经济学家的结论，认为环境学家们错

0 0 回复 2021-09-28 19:34:15
贾思敏

C.The first supports the conclusion of the environmentalists’ argument E.Each supports the conclusion of the economist’s argument 两个黑体都是结论，不能用support，只有条件才是去support别人的argument或conclusion

0 0 回复 2021-09-20 16:56:32
158706lvuy

做题的时候没注意看environmentalists和economists,就尴尬了～

0 0 回复 2020-09-17 10:41:34
LO1S

看清economists和environmentalists。。。第一句不是econominists的事。。直接排除ABE CD当中明显选D

0 0 回复 2020-04-09 18:35:30
小红帽wyf

https://www.jianshu.com/p/a3ed16204061

0 0 回复 2019-10-17 10:23:57
chloewen

看得我一脸懵逼

0 0 回复 2019-07-10 23:38:39
STTTS

笑死了

0 0 回复 2018-11-15 07:04:00
猛杀gmat

草泥马：D：the second states that conclusion states the conclusion of the economist's argument 打得重复了，怪不得我看不懂

0 0 回复 2018-10-08 15:05:08
wicky

C的选项输入有误吧，答案应该是c

0 0 回复 2018-10-06 08:15:12
oliver690

http://www.gmatonline.cn/question/10384.html GWD题目的一个变体，2个题干部分几乎一致

0 0 回复 2018-09-21 19:48:52