
A:land tenure取决于kinship的强弱,而一家人居住的时间长短可以反映出kinship的强弱
B:文章没有提到T对security的影响和对产权的影响
C:没有提到二者的对比
D:住的久的人更容易接受改良作物而不是化学除草剂
E:没有提到
题目讨论 (10条评论)

-
ziqi
C不是对比,是一个层层递进的关系。 Researchers also measured land-tenure security: in Tawahka society, kinship ties are a more important indicator of this than are legal property rights, so researchers measured it by a household’s duration of residence in its village. They found that longer residence correlated with more adoption of improved plant varieties but less adoption of chemical herbicides.居住时间长短-kinship tie-land tenure。 题目翻译过来是:文章指出,在研究中提到的收集关于土地保有权安全的信息的方法( Researchers also measured land-tenure security)反映了以下哪对关于塔瓦卡社会的假设?
0
0 回复 2022-03-23 18:49:02
-
贾思敏
题型:suggests 推理题(基于原文信息的进一步推理) 高亮部分收集了关于security of land tenure这方面的信息,是为了反映了关于Tawahka society的以下哪个假设? 文中提到security of land tenure的地方是:Researchers also measured land-tenure security: in Tawahka society, kinship ties are a more important indicator of this than are legal property rights, so researchers measured it by a household’s duration of residence in its village. They found that longer residence correlated with more adoption of improved plant varieties but less adoption of chemical herbicides. 品品这两句中kinship、land-tenure security、household's duration of residence的相互影响关系(到底是谁影响谁,谁又影响了谁):①kinship ties are indicator of land-tenure security,所以land tenure depends on...household’s kinship ties②measured it by a household’s duration of residence,所以就是household's duration of residence is an indication of...kinship ties C选项:kinship和its quantity of nonland wealth的比较,the duration of a household’s residence和kinship ties的比较,都是无关比较
0
0 回复 2021-09-27 17:41:55
-
贾思敏回复贾思敏
哦 打错了,重点是这一句:Researchers also measured land-tenure security: in Tawahka society, kinship ties are a more important indicator of this than are legal property rights, so researchers measured it by a household’s duration of residence in its village. 它后面那句不重要
0
0 回复 2021-09-27 17:43:35
-
-
朋友醒醒
Nonland wealth was also associated with more adoption of both technologies, but availability of uncultivated land reduced the incentive to employ the productivity‐enhancing technologies. Researchers also measured land-tenure security: in Tawahka society, kinship ties are a more important indicator of this than are legal property rights, so researchers measured it by a household’s duration of residence in its village. They found that longer residence correlated with more adoption of improved plant varieties but less adoption of chemical herbicides.
0
0 回复 2021-09-14 01:08:08
-
朋友醒醒回复朋友醒醒
答案并不只在高亮附近,还是要要把文章大概通读分层。
0
0 回复 2021-09-14 01:09:57
-
贾思敏回复朋友醒醒
对的,因为这是推理题
0
0 回复 2021-09-27 17:29:33
-
-
Run123
难在需要脑补两个假设,形成逻辑链条:长期居住倾向于接受more plant varieties/ less chemical herbisides ,因为一下逻辑: long residence-+ [stronger kinship]-[security of land tenure]-more adoption of plant varieties, less chemical herbicides
3
0 回复 2020-05-17 13:03:07
-
贾思敏回复Run123
你这个思路棒
0
0 回复 2021-11-23 18:40:42
-
-
emily666
看清题目问的是:security of land tenure reflects
1
0 回复 2020-03-29 15:04:37
-
一只大鲨鱼
表面上高亮题应该是在该文段左右找答案,奈何这个study在文中是新理论的提出,提出的内容都在文段末,所以要找出最起到概括性的答案总结其理论内容。不要被高亮蒙蔽了眼睛
2
0 回复 2020-03-18 10:49:41
-
鸡鸡沙西米
正确答案A
0
0 回复 2019-12-28 13:56:40
-
344956hqwg
kinship ties are a more important indicator of this than are legal property rights, so researchers measured it by a household’s duration of residence in its village. 这里得kinship ties明明是复数,怎么用it指代呢
1
0 回复 2019-12-10 21:12:44
-
dGee回复344956hqwg
it 这里指的前面的land-tenure security
0
0 回复 2020-04-20 15:47:31
-
-
该用户没有名字
所以高亮部分的意义在哪里。。
2
0 回复 2019-11-09 09:28:00
-
Lllllllla
结构: 1. 主旨句:one proposal有2个新技术可以保护雨林——IPV和CH 2. Studies发现有3个变量(education, wealth, and security of land tenure)和是否采用这两个新技术有关 3. A recent study另一个study a. Formal education → IPV↑ CH↓ b. Nonland wealth → 都↑ c. Land-tenure security : 取决于 kinship, which取决于duration of residence
7
0 回复 2019-10-06 11:50:01