建议使用官方纸质指南,查看对照完整题目
【OG20-P791-791题】
Often major economic shifts are so gradual as to be indistinguishable at first from ordinary fluctuations in the financial markets.
-
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx



选A当前版本由 luluan 更新于2021-10-25 09:58:41 感谢由 luluan 对此题目的解答所做出的贡献。
A.正确。So ..as to=so..that
B.they无指代
C.they无指代,that后定语从句修饰不简洁
D.enough放置位置错,逻辑错
E.enough放置位置错,逻辑错,one、them指代不明,且整体句式杂糅
语义上
so...如此...(强调adj的程度很高/强烈)
enough...足以...(有达到最低标准意味)
根据句意不用enough
题目讨论 (10条评论)

-
280810fq
解析不要随便误导人没有指代! 1. concise - so adj as to/ so... that最简洁最优选 2.指代-可能造成wordy/混淆,
0
0 回复 2022-09-27 13:32:47
-
哥大我来了
c的they为什么是无指代,不可以指代economic shifts吗?
4
1 回复 2022-06-07 10:25:59
-
Karenxjy回复哥大我来了
对啊对啊!有没有大神解释一下
0
0 回复 2022-06-29 15:20:09
-
Gmat 730回复哥大我来了
OG的解釋是這樣: B. The word can is “redundant” here, given the ending -able of indistinguishable. The intended sense could be conveyed by so gradual that they are indistinguishable—even though this would not be a use of the idiom mentioned above. C. This contains awkward verbiage in the phrase are unable to. The intended sense would be better conveyed by cannot—even though this would not be a use of the idiom mentioned above. 沒有說B,C選項they無指代,而是用冗詞 (redundant)排除
0
0 回复 2022-06-29 19:11:48
-
-
vv不熬夜
So ..as to=so..that 学会了 嘻嘻
0
0 回复 2022-04-10 22:56:16
-
ziqi
C.be unable to 表示主观动作 I am unable to tackle this difficult problem. 这里用shifts are unable 不优. So as to= so that
0
0 回复 2022-03-19 10:54:25
-
zhbzhb回复ziqi
没错,C选项里unable to的表意非常错误,就仿佛在表达major economic shifts没有能力去处理某事,但事实上major economic shifts是没法作为一个动作施加方去处理事情的的。
1
0 回复 2022-08-27 14:07:36
-
zhbzhb回复ziqi
简而言之就是说:able/unable后面永远不能跟被动语态,因为able/unable必须用在一个由施加方作为主语的句子
1
0 回复 2022-08-27 14:09:57
-
-
有名字
一般主要经济转变是很渐进以至于最初是很在金融市场上普通的波动是不明显的。 A so..as to=so that; so as to加be比较多,so that加v动词比较多 B are; they can be 两个谓语 C that定从be unable to,不能说有能力被做,有能力没能力都是主动做 D enough to do足够做;enough not to do 足够不做不对 E enough和so that句式杂糅,不对
1
0 回复 2022-01-12 14:31:54
-
225362lqfx
这解析有点毛病啊: A Correct B.they 不是无所指代 they可以指代shifts;这里错在can的用法上,-able的词缀表示具有...的能力 与can存在语义重复 C.be unable to 表示主观动作 I am unable to tackle this difficult problem. 这里用shifts are unable 不优 D.enough也表示主观动作 E. enough to do 和 so that 这里冗余;且enough也表示主观动作
2
0 回复 2022-01-02 23:08:46
-
milestone123
Hhjj
0
0 回复 2021-11-30 16:13:05
-
700冲冲冲!!
c冗余
0
0 回复 2021-11-18 11:01:37
-
朋友醒醒
So ..as to=so..that 考虑简洁问题,代词一般越少越好
1
1 回复 2021-09-14 07:42:10
-
贾思敏
而且B.so gradual they can be indistinguishable,前面已经有个are了然后又说they can be...这不是有两个谓语了吗
0
0 回复 2021-08-26 22:37:49