
1. W v US case: right to use water near India Reservation was reserved to American Indians by the tready (established by the reservation)
tready: not mention water right-federal government: reserve-nevertheless the land would be useless
federal rights to reserve water for particular use:
-the land in question
-the land has been formally withdraw from federal public lands
-the government intended to reserve water and land when esablishing the reservation
2. American Indian tribes用另外的方式获得water rights<-traditional diversion and use of waters prior to the US's acq of soverrignty
eg. RG pueblos exists before-not constitute a part of federal publiclands
apply of winter doctrine: what constitutes an American Indian reservation
-pueblos->reservation
A v C reservation creation manner not affect the application of winter doctrine->pueblow: priority to use water over other citizens
题目讨论 (10条评论)

-
ziqi
紧接着就是Although this treaty did not mention water rights,
0
0 回复 2022-03-30 16:55:44
-
ByeByeG
Although this treaty did not mention water rights 同义改写
0
0 回复 2022-02-14 16:11:24
-
389949ccju
无语真的无语。。
0
0 回复 2022-01-21 19:29:07
-
474700rock
答案在第二句里找 “Although this treaty did not mention water rights...”
0
0 回复 2021-11-23 17:17:45
-
虫0515
https://forum.chasedream.com/thread-912701-1-1.html 贴个详解
0
0 回复 2021-11-02 22:06:37
-
355266qgmd回复虫0515
失效了
0
0 回复 2021-11-19 10:29:29
-
-
酒仙桥程潇
太难了呜呜呜
1
0 回复 2021-09-01 15:40:14
-
449760bmlb
做个人吧..
3
0 回复 2021-07-11 21:36:17
-
226223ub
太难了呜呜呜呜
0
0 回复 2021-06-19 18:31:15
-
1485405wibx
好家伙,不愧是gmat巅峰之作
3
0 回复 2021-05-05 16:16:56
-
205838uqks回复1485405wibx
真的看不懂。何以知道是巅峰之作?不过您这么说我倒觉得是种安慰
0
0 回复 2021-09-10 21:26:06
-
-
Edward.
文章大意
Treaty判定印第安人保留水权。在三种特殊情况下,联邦政府有水权。
印第安人确实拥有水权。
1. 细节题
定位第二句although部分
0
0 回复 2021-04-23 15:26:15