
1. 不是基于法律定义,而是基于实际情况
A. 一致
B. 这个方法针对的是印第安人,不是所有人
C. D. E. 无关
题目讨论 (5条评论)

-
如果有时间的话我也能做对
This fact, however, has not barred(没被禁止即是established虽然never formally) application of the Winters doctrine. What constitutes an American Indian reservation(答案在说reservation) is a question of practice, not of legal definition(意思即是never formally), and the pueblos have always been treated(答案在说been treated as such A ">grants recognition to reservations that were never formally established but that have traditionally been treated as such
0
0 回复 2021-07-19 12:56:37
-
TQ
The pragmatic approach is referring to "What constitutes an American Indian reservation is a question of practice, not of the legal definition", 即 Winters doctrine虽然有criteria for federal rights to reserve water for particular purposes, but it has broader application based on practices.
0
0 回复 2020-12-27 05:04:24
-
571661zxzq
b。说的是确定了一个特殊地区的水权,过于片面。 pragmatic approach整体说了水权在另外一种情况下(informal)也是可以行使的, the Rio Grande pueblos仅仅是个例子支持第二种情况,所以选b不好
0
0 回复 2020-08-13 03:35:18
-
571661zxzq回复571661zxzq
而且文章也没说all citizens, 说的是Pueblo Indians have water rights
0
0 回复 2020-08-13 03:40:14
-
-
klmadge
The “pragmatic approach”到底指的是判别什么的方法,是关键。 5个选项中,BCE说的都是 有没有water right,而D说的是 有没有legal right,只有A说的是 能不能被确认为 “reservation”,而这正是前面那句话“What constitutes an American Indian reservation is a question of practice, not of legal definition, and the pueblos have always been treated as reservations by the United States. ”的含义。
1
0 回复 2020-08-02 10:17:02
-
245240abh
B选项,我觉得是 examining 和 based on 是有差别的
0
0 回复 2019-12-07 12:53:43