建议使用官方纸质指南,查看对照完整题目
【OG20-P809-879题】
Because there are provisions of the new maritime code that provide that even tiny islets can be the basis for claims to the fisheries and oil fields of large sea areas, they have already stimulated international disputes over uninhabited islands.
-
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

选B
语义:因为新的海上条约要求即使小岛屿也能当作渔业和油田的声索依据,它已经激发了国际上对无人岛的争端。
A选项,太啰嗦了 there are provisions 和provide重复了;硬伤:they指代code单数错误。
B选项,正确。
C选项,重心改变,修饰成分:“under provisions”本意上是主谓结构“Even tiny islets can be the basis……”的状语,但由于其位于主谓结构的句尾且未与主谓结构之间并为以逗号相隔,因此其有作定语修饰“sea areas”表达“在新海上条约要求下的海域”的意思的可能,因此修饰关系并不明确。
D选项, this裸奔。
E选项,只有从句没有主句。
题目讨论 (10条评论)

-
ziqi
Provision表提供供给,和provide重复了,而不是表条款。code是主语
0
0 回复 2022-04-04 19:34:24
-
贾思敏
A provide主谓不一致啊,code that provides才对
0
0 回复 2021-09-16 17:17:05
-
700冲冲冲!
ron: choice (d) uses "this" as a standalone pronoun. that's pretty much never acceptable in a formal written sentence. if you're going to use "this", you should use it as an adjective: this thing, this finding, this statistic, etc. -- also, here's some "extra credit" knowledge: there ARE constructions that can stand for the abstract information in an entire clause (unlike pronouns, which are limited to standing for actual nouns). chief among these are the COMMA + NOUN modifiers. however, the presence of "because" at the beginning of choice (d) would preclude the use of those modifiers as well. here's an example: studies have shown that X is 60 percent of Y, a finding that has shocked most observers. studies have shown that X is 60 percent of Y; this finding has shocked most observers. --> both correct. note that "a finding", following the comma, or "this finding", standing alone after the semicolon, stands for the entirety of the clause that comes before it; you couldn't use "which" here, because "which" would automatically refer to Y. because studies have shown that X is 60 percent of Y, this finding has shocked most observers. --> incorrect. the presence of "because" at the beginning of the first clause means you can't use "this finding" anymore. i don't have any idea what the actual rule is here, but i do know with 100% certainty that these constructions are allowed and disallowed respectively.
4
0 回复 2021-04-08 09:40:01
-
1047789l
B中的it是指代maritime code吗
1
0 回复 2020-12-28 19:48:32
-
221727pxsy
1.this等代词不能裸奔 2.定语,under provision 的修饰主体有歧义 3.SVO,islet can be ,stimulating 对前面补充不合适 4.already是完成时,不能用ing 5.they的修饰歧义
0
0 回复 2020-08-28 11:50:54
-
571661zxzq
B,E 有because是subordinator 连接两个句子,独立存在只是dependent clause C, 不能用this指代
0
0 回复 2020-07-17 03:37:35
-
340101igzc
我就一个问题,B选项中的"basis"难道不是名词吗?如果说B对,解释也应该是"it"行使了它最基本的用法,即指代了前一句的主语。看到前面好多人说B项里只有"code"一个名词,我这强迫症就犯......
0
0 回复 2020-07-04 14:24:17
-
babyweezy
因为XXcode,而不是因为XX小岛
0
0 回复 2019-09-16 10:37:24
-
陈Sir
D选项 this可能指代code,可能指代整件事儿,所以不够明确
0
0 回复 2019-07-17 13:30:33
-
yejinsui回复陈Sir
不是, 曼哈顿语法里面说了this和these都不能 作名词的代词。所以他永远不可能指代code
0
1 回复 2019-08-03 10:57:30
-
Oaken_Sheldon回复陈Sir
this/these 不能裸奔,就跟人一样。
2
0 回复 2020-07-17 03:04:26
-
-
EscapeFromFate
先看主语,provisions/the new maritime code/tiny islets,tiny islets改变了句子主次,所以排除CDE,AB对比,A的that provide that用法错误,指代不明,而且provisions是无法stimulate international disputes的,而new maritime code可以
0
0 回复 2019-01-23 15:46:40