建议使用官方纸质指南,查看对照完整题目
【OG20-P813-901题】
Last week local shrimpers held a news conference to take some credit for the resurgence of the rare Kemp’s ridley turtle, saying that their compliance with laws requiring that turtle-excluder devices be on shrimp nets protect adult sea turtles.
-
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

选B
saying that宾从的主语是compliance,ACD选项,主谓单复数不一致。E选项,to require做后置定语修饰laws语义不合理,根据语义这个法律已经在实施中了,所以不用to do不定式修饰。
题目讨论 (10条评论)

-
180687pkqh
compliance 是主语,谓语单数 law V-ing 表法律的内容性质 law to do 表法律的目的
0
0 回复 2022-04-18 22:38:33
-
ziqi
看懂这道题的主语是compliance
0
0 回复 2022-04-11 16:58:21
-
lavin.Z
再错又错了一遍。。 1.区分句子核心词,无论是[requirng...]/[to require],都是作为定语修饰laws;而作为动词名词化comply with laws-->compliance with laws,因此核心词在此处是compliance;所以谓语动词有单数,排除 剩下BE选项 2.to do表目的,而requiring作为定语修饰laws,补充说明laws的性质,因此根据语义,选择requring,B选项
1
0 回复 2022-01-04 17:56:34
-
angelfighting
这句话 主语是their compliance,是单数,排除acd。语义上require 修饰compliance,排除e
1
0 回复 2021-08-09 21:31:41
-
啦啦啦啦噜
make
0
0 回复 2021-01-13 16:04:54
-
224048l
sth. require that +虚拟(do) 不行吗
0
0 回复 2020-11-03 23:05:08
-
229715zw回复224048l
应该用protects
1
0 回复 2020-11-22 13:23:17
-
-
Balala
their compliance 说明要单数形式 排出ACD to require表目的 不符合语义 排除E
0
0 回复 2020-07-02 09:38:07
-
zzzyyr
requiring 引导同位语从句修饰compliance,compliance is sth
0
0 回复 2019-11-29 10:06:30
-
zzzyyr回复zzzyyr
law
0
0 回复 2019-11-29 10:07:25
-
yolanda8回复zzzyyr
引导定语从句修饰laws
1
0 回复 2020-04-21 10:14:13
-
-
夏夏夏筱染
做题到现在,自己却一直忽略主谓一致这个基本考点。要被自己气死了
3
0 回复 2019-09-05 15:24:35
-
dGee回复夏夏夏筱染
偶尔我也是,真想锤死自己
0
0 回复 2019-09-06 14:54:37
-
-
夏夏夏筱染
摘自曼哈顿ron: (b) is the correct answer. it uses "require" with a direct object, as discussed above, and it also correctly uses the singular verb "is" with the singular subject "compliance". (we know "compliance" is the subject, because "with ..." is a prepositional phrase that serves only as a modifier of that subject.) -- (c) "protect" is a plural verb and so doesn't agree with the singular subject "compliance". -- (d) "are" is a plural verb and so doesn't agree with the singular subject "compliance". -- (d) and (e) "laws to require..." isn't a correct idiom if you're discussing the actual text of the laws themselves. if you were discussing the ultimate purpose of those laws, then this could be idiomatic. examples: laws specifying long jail sentences for drunk drivers --> correct (___ing), since that's what the laws actually specify. laws to specify long jail sentences for drunk drivers --> incorrect (that's not the ultimate purpose of the laws) laws to discourage drunk driving --> correct (this IS actually the ultimate purpose of the laws)
3
0 回复 2019-09-05 15:19:08
-
Jennysolarenergy回复夏夏夏筱染
请问哪里能看到ron的回答呢?一直找不到,谢谢
0
0 回复 2019-11-24 15:22:53
-
1289311ww回复夏夏夏筱染
你翻墙就可以看到了
1
0 回复 2019-12-28 15:08:49
-