【OG20-P599-730题】In countries where automobile insurance includes c_OG16

雷哥网GMAT>题库>OG16>逻辑CR >8873

逻辑CR-8873 【难度:600-650】 Time Cost00:00

报告题目错误

请选择错误类型：

请描述一下这个错误：

取消

建议使用官方纸质指南，查看对照完整题目

【OG20-P599-730题】

In countries where automobile insurance includes compensation for whiplash injuries sustained in automobile accidents, reports of having suffered such injuries are twice as frequent as they are in countries where whiplash is not covered. Presently, no objective test for whiplash exists, so it is true that spurious reports of whiplash injuries cannot be readily identified. Nevertheless, these facts do not warrant the conclusion drawn by some commentators that in the countries with the higher rates of reported whiplash injuries, half of the reported cases are spurious. Clearly, in countries where automobile insurance does not include compensation for whiplash, people often have little incentive to report whiplash injuries that they actually have suffered.

In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?

A

The first is a claim that the argument disputes; the second is a conclusion that has been based on that claim.
分析A选项
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

B

The first is a claim that has been used to support a conclusion that the argument accepts; the second is that conclusion.
分析B选项
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

C

The first is evidence that has been used to support a conclusion for which the argument provides further evidence; the second is the main conclusion of the argument.
分析C选项
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

D

The first is a finding whose implications are at issue in the argument; the second is a claim presented in order to argue against deriving certain implications from that finding.
分析D选项
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

E

The first is a finding whose accuracy is evaluated in the argument; the second is evidence presented to establish that the finding is accurate.
分析E选项
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

该题平均耗时：3m21s ，平均正确率：55.7%。该题由网友YVOxbqEt提供。更多GMAT题目请

网友解析

暂无雷哥网文字解析

预约名师一对一题目解析课程

当前版本由雷哥GMAT小7 更新于2017-10-10 11:18:18 感谢由雷哥GMAT小7 对此题目的解答所做出的贡献。

The first is a finding whose implications are at issue in the argument; the second is a claim presented in order to argue against deriving certain implications from that finding.

第一句提出一个现象
第二句反驳对此现象做出的某个解释第二句的deriving certain implications 指的是conclusion drawn by some commentators that in the countries with the higher rates of reported whiplash injuries, half of the reported cases are spurious. 也就是说第二句的作用是反对评论家从此现象得到他们的结论

题目讨论（10条评论）

提交

emily666

这种题型烦死了总是错

0 0 回复 2020-03-27 20:55:33
一战就过

claim： an assertion of the truth of sth, typically one which is disputed or in doubt. finding: a conclusion reached as a result of an inquiry, investigation, or trail.

0 0 回复 2019-09-17 12:02:35
嘎嘣苏

evidence就可以直接把E干掉了.....我为什么会错这个zz题

0 0 回复 2018-11-29 16:53:27
AUCHUI

nevertheless能不能当作转折来看这样就oppose了？？？

0 0 回复 2018-09-26 17:03:42
AUCHUI回复AUCHUI

是的你真棒

0 0 回复 2018-09-26 17:07:48

Yang1116回复 JJOY

可爱

0 0 回复 2018-10-10 15:46:16

AUCHUI回复AUCHUI

好嘞~

0 0 回复 2018-12-12 22:11:44
飞飞哥哥

非加粗部分也要看！ D项 deriving certain implications from that finding. certain implications指因为不能分辨真伪就觉得报告是假的的想法 finding就是有保险的报告人数是无保险的报告人数两倍这件事

0 0 回复 2018-09-09 14:09:42
Yang1116回复飞飞哥哥

最好直接读一遍不然返工回读更浪费时间。

0 0 回复 2018-09-19 23:33:51
( ¨̮ )

有人能把选项翻译一下吗。。。

0 0 回复 2018-03-18 12:42:54

Vicky9682

在保险包括颈椎受伤的国家，上报的颈椎受伤的数目时不包颈椎国家的两倍。 现在，没有客观的检查可以证明颈椎受伤，所以假报告查不出来。但是，这个现象不能说明某些评论家说的“一半报告都是假的”。显然，在不包颈椎的国家，人们经常没有东动机上报他们所受的颈椎伤害。
The first is a finding whose implications are at issue in the argument; the second is a claim presented in order to argue against deriving certain implications from that finding. 

第一个黑体显然是一个现象，但对他有两个解读（专家的、作者的），所以引发争议。
第二个黑体是在提出另一个解读，是在反对专家的的看法。但专家的、作者的都是基于第一个黑体这个发现之上的。

0 回复 2017-10-11 22:35:00

Bink

在网上搜出来的每个版本黑体部分都不是同一个地方。。。

0 0 回复 2017-02-21 17:01:45
1215puff

有WJ补偿的国家，对WJ的理赔比不补偿的国家多。人们认为W无法判定，所以骗保很难识破。他们错在认为在WJ频率更高的国家，一般WJ都是假的。在不理赔的国家，就算遭到了也不报告（不是没有，而是没报告）。 nevertheless的出现表面第二句应该和第一句相反，最后一句前的clearly表明最有一句应该是观点。 A.第二个是base on第一个的，而1和2是反向 B.support，错 C.support，错 E.第二个是evidence，但第二个是观点，错（刚写错了）

0 0 回复 2015-10-27 20:44:49
1215puff

有WJ补偿的国家，对WJ的理赔比不补偿的国家多。人们认为W无法判定，所以骗保很难识破。他们错在认为在WJ频率更高的国家，一般WJ都是假的。在不理赔的国家，就算遭到了也不报告（不是没有，而是没报告）。 nevertheless的出现表面第二句应该和第一句相反，最后一句前的clearly表明最有一句应该是观点。 A.第二个是base on第一个的，而1和2是反向 B.support，错 C.support，错 D.第二个是evidence，但第二个是观点，错

0 0 回复 2015-10-27 20:44:22