【OG20-P602-738题】Since it has become known that several of a bank's_OG16

雷哥网GMAT>题库>OG16>逻辑CR >8890

逻辑CR-8890 【难度:650-680】 Time Cost00:00

报告题目错误

请选择错误类型：

请描述一下这个错误：

取消

建议使用官方纸质指南，查看对照完整题目

【OG20-P602-738题】

Since it has become known that several of a bank's top executives have been buying shares in their own bank, the bank's depositors, who had been worried by rumors that the bank faced impending financial collapse, have been greatly relieved. They reason that, since top executives evidently have faith in the bank's financial soundness, those worrisome rumors must be false. Such reasoning might well be overoptimistic, however, since corporate executives have been known to buy shares in their own company in a calculated attempt to dispel negative rumors about the company's health.

In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?

A

The first describes evidence that has been taken as supporting a conclusion; the second gives a reason for questioning that support.
分析A选项
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

B

The first describes evidence that has been taken as supporting a conclusion; the second states a contrary conclusion that is the main conclusion of the argument.
分析B选项
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

C

The first provides evidence in support of the main conclusion of the argument; the second states that conclusion.
分析C选项
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

D

The first describes the circumstance that the argument as a whole seeks to explain; the second gives the explanation that the argument seeks to establish.
分析D选项
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

E

The first describes the circumstance that the argument as a whole seeks to explain; the second provides evidence in support of the explanation that the argument seeks toEstablish.
分析E选项
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

该题平均耗时：2m28s ，平均正确率：41%。该题由网友aNTY提供。更多GMAT题目请

网友解析

暂无雷哥网文字解析

预约名师一对一题目解析课程

当前版本由 windwing 更新于2015-07-24 11:29:50 感谢由 windwing 对此题目的解答所做出的贡献。

因为一些银行高管买自家银行股票为大家所知，银行储户，本来担心银行面临即将到来的财务危机，现在大大减轻了担心。他们推断，因为高管对银行财务状况持有信心，令人担心的谣言肯定是假的。 然而，这种推论过于乐观了，因为众所周知公司高管试图减轻对公司健康的负面谣言而买自家股票。

显然第一个提出了客观证据来支持谣言不必担心。 However转折词表明结论乐观了，对前面推论提出反对结论，反对的理由就是Since后面的那段黑体，所以答案是A

题目讨论（10条评论）

提交

432442ba

A选项，第二部分不应该是削弱那个reason的吗？怎么成了削弱support了？这俩不是一个东西吧

0 0 回复 2019-09-29 21:51:51
614475hs

现象1+ 主观1 + 主观2 + 解释2. however 可以提到句首。主观2反驳主观1

0 0 回复 2019-08-13 19:38:30
LettyPan

conclusion的还有一个翻译是观点的意思，不一定是最终结论

1 0 回复 2019-01-05 23:11:43
斯德哥尔摩zzzzzzz

第一句是支持观点一的，因为第一句的开头有一个容易被忽略的since,所以是个evidence 。

1 0 回复 2019-01-02 16:47:26
Rofinia

D选项本身表述就有歧义。后半部分：第二个BF是一个解释，这个解释是argument想要建立的。一种理解是说whole argument要建立的，即支持main conclusion 第二种理解是（特别是跟D中对BF1中的explain的解释联系），BF2正是对于BF1的explain

0 0 回复 2018-08-17 16:38:38
zyChen

Since it has become known that several of a bank’s top executives have been buying shares in their own bank （evidence 1）, the bank’s depositors, who had been worried by rumors that the bank faced impending fi nancial collapse, have been greatly relieved. They reason that, since top executives evidently have faith in the bank’s fi nancial soundness, those worrisome rumors must be false. (conclusion 1) Such reasoning might well be overoptimistic (conclusion 2), however, since corporate executives have been known to buy shares in their own company in a calculated attempt to dispel negative rumors about the company’s health （evidence 2）. 在读题的时候就分清楚哪些是evidence，哪些是conclusion. 这样就容易理清每句话之间的关系了。 conclusion 1是从evidence 1得出来的。 conclusion 2在质疑conclusion 1. evidence 2 给出了质疑的理由。

3 0 回复 2018-04-02 20:44:37
braybray回复zyChen

牛！

0 0 回复 2018-05-02 08:01:06

Sunnie22回复zyChen

为什么第一句是证据啊，总感觉是在说一个现象，后面有两种观点的意思。。。

1 0 回复 2018-07-27 18:01:45

cloud9回复zyChen

我觉得，文章想解释的是the bank's depositors, who had been worried by rumors..., have been greatly relieved这个现象，而bf1这句话明显就是depositor觉得谣言是假的（结论1）的evidence，top executives evidently have faith in the bank’s financial soundness这句话则support结论1。文章的main conclusion（...太乐观...）的evidence是bf2，直接反驳了结论1的support（高官不是有信心而是为了消除谣言）注意，结论2并没有直接用到bf1作为论据哦

0 0 回复 2018-11-07 10:24:51
杀鸡志在必得

D为什么错误

0 0 回复 2017-12-31 20:03:44
genkirocket回复杀鸡志在必得

D答案说的是第一个BF是文章想要解释的现象，第二个BF解释了这个现象，可是第二个BF本身不是第一个BF的解释，它是support conclusion的。

0 0 回复 2018-08-14 16:14:45
千千

main conclusion: Such reasoning might well be overoptimistic one conclusion: those worrisome rumors must be false 第一个黑体字是支持 one conclusion的第二个黑体字是反对第一个黑体对one conclusion的支持；提供支持main conclusion的解释的

0 0 回复 2017-11-12 21:24:51
早起的虫子被鸟吃

B为什么不选

0 0 回复 2017-10-17 22:48:16
杀鸡志在必得回复早起的虫子被鸟吃

第二个不是main conclusion 而是支持main conclusion的

1 0 回复 2017-12-31 20:04:19
xiaoyi

注意since 作者的观点，尽管有一个however连接上下文，其实是跟前面提到的那个fact是没有直接逻辑关系的

0 0 回复 2017-01-17 20:48:08