中间图

Or
句子改错SC-10858 【难度:650-680】 Time Cost00:00
收藏
报告题目错误
请选择错误类型:
请描述一下这个错误:

取消

To develop more accurate population forecasts, demographers have to know a great deal more than now about the social and economic determinants of fertility.



  • 分析A选项 分析选校图标
    xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • 分析B选项 分析选校图标
    xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • 分析C选项 分析选校图标
    xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • 分析D选项 分析选校图标
    xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • 分析E选项 分析选校图标
    xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
暂无雷哥网文字解析
当前版本由 百香果蜂蜜茶 更新于2015-07-10 15:11:01 感谢由 百香果蜂蜜茶 对此题目的解答所做出的贡献。
(A) a great deal与now比较(than后面只有一个成分now,所以a great deal只有与其进行对比),概念不对等。
(B) economic的意思是:relating to trade, industry, and the management of money,而economical为便宜or节省的意思,根据逻辑含义应该用economic。
(C) economical使用错误。
(E) a great deal与now比较,概念不对等 。

题目讨论 13条评论)

用户头像
提交
  • 用户头像

    不到740不分手

    为什么不能理解为比较状语的省略啊?now不是时间状语么,前面的主谓宾可以全部省略啊。
    0 0 回复 2020-07-30 13:13:58
  • 用户头像

    693366dgol

    这道题的破题店不应该是would和have,而应该简单地只用economic和economical,以及比较对象是否合理来区分
    0 0 回复 2020-05-10 14:38:32
  • 用户头像

    Annnnnnnnnnn

    RON大神的解析
    don't forget the difference between "economic" and "economical", which is huge.
    "economic" means "having to do with "economics and/or the economy". (this is the intended meaning.)
    "economical" means "efficient" or "at low cost/expense". (this is not the intended meaning.)
    
    i think this sentence makes sense with either "would have to" or "have to". there's a slight rhetorical difference ("would have to" carries the connotation that these forecasts are just hypothetical and don't actually have to be developed, or that at least it's not important, while "have to" implies that these forecasts are important and have to be made), but you don't have to make such rhetorical distinctions on the exam.
    in this case, you don't have to, since both choices involving "have to" (without "would") are wrong for other reasons.
    
    (a) is only wrong for the reason mentioned by the poster above me.
    0 0 回复 2019-12-30 05:36:55
  • 用户头像

    Alan Wong

    为什么用would啊,不明白了
    0 0 回复 2019-06-09 19:21:28
  • 用户头像

    Kath1230

    than 前后的对比要平行 
    前面用了have to know 后面than对比的也要do的形式 否则不平行 所以AE排除
    economical是节省的 economic是经济的 所以应该选social and economic的选项 所以是D
    0 0 回复 2019-02-09 14:34:18
  • 用户头像

    浣沅九

    specifically, the first verb is in a hypothetical/conditional tense (would have to know...), while the second verb is in the present tense (they do [= know] now). you are not allowed to imply such tense transitions.
    if you omit the verb, the omitted verb will be assumed to be in the same tense as its parallel counterpart. since you have to change tenses in this problem, you must include both verbs.
    0 0 回复 2019-01-24 16:45:02
  • 用户头像

    浣沅九

    in A and E you are not comparing similar things 
    
    demographers have to know a great deal more than now about social and economic ...
    
    literally you're comparing the knowledge about social and economic determinants to now. 
    
    Consider the following example 
    
    I have to run faster than now. 
    
    This is clear incorrect. what is now? This doesn't make any sense 
    
    I have to run faster than I do now. Correct
    0 0 回复 2019-01-24 16:37:38
  • 用户头像

    浣沅九

    还是没懂,所以这个到底是什么的比较?又不是宾语A GREAT DEAL的比较,为什么要求now和a great deal要对等.....?现在对比较真的迷
    0 0 回复 2019-01-24 16:34:42
  • 用户头像

    斯莫维特

    为什么now前面的they do不能省略?
    0 0 回复 2018-10-13 12:37:43
    • 评论用户头像

      暖暖lit回复斯莫维特

      我觉得可以省略的,但是没此答案

      0 0 回复 2019-01-15 12:26:09

    • 评论用户头像

      209637h回复斯莫维特

      成分相同才能省略 但前面是they would 后面是 they do 不相同 og有一道类似的 说的是地震还是电话来着 可以看看

      0 0 回复 2019-12-09 23:59:06

  • 用户头像

    默默

    在事情还没发生的情况下,可用虚拟语气
    0 0 回复 2018-05-02 14:32:47
    • 评论用户头像

      默默回复默默

      more than 前后要平等

      0 0 回复 2018-05-02 14:34:09

  • 用户头像

    LANYUEQI

    实意动词省略写为do/did,不能全部不写
    0 0 回复 2017-08-16 11:25:59
  • 用户头像

    晔晔

    动词比较  助动词不能省略
    0 0 回复 2017-07-25 12:54:21
    • 评论用户头像

      xixi冲鸭回复晔晔

      谁说的 别的题正确答案就是 主谓相同 主谓都可省略

      0 0 回复 2019-01-15 11:31:37

  • 用户头像

    萝御兼修

    would have to know是不很肯定的语气,其表达的是have to do的内容只是一个假设,并不是真的"必须",而have to表达的意思是,要做的事情非常重要,"必须"去做。在本题中两种含义都合理,因此没有必要做这样的区分。
    0 0 回复 2017-07-05 22:21:28
    本题信息

    1m14s

    平均耗时

    75.2%

    平均正确率

    • 题目来源1:破解版08
    • 题目来源2:GWD–TN24套

    该题由网友O479mf提供 上传GMAT题

    • 手机注册
    • 邮箱注册
    登录>







    关闭图标

    标题图

    • 图标

      知识库学习

      GMAT语法、逻辑、阅读、数学各单项备考知识点学习及测验
    • 图标

      在线做题

      包含GMAT各单项必考知识点题目、OG/PREP/GWD/雷哥讲义题目、难度650/680/700/730题库题目练习及题目解析
    • 图标

      在线模考

      语文套题/数学套题/全套仿真模考,包含GWD/PERP/精选模考等上百套套题模考
    • 图标

      在线测评

      适合5种不同基础的GMAT学员,测评后可自动出具分数报告及复习计划指导
    • 图标

      资料下载

      GMAT必备备考资料下载、鸡精下载、课程课件等免费下载
    • 图标

      课程学习

      注册会员后,可在GMAT课程区,选择免费直播课程及公开课程进行在线学习
    ×
    请你选择你要查看的模考成绩单
    立即开通 暂不开通
    加载图片
    网络异常