中间图

Or
阅读RC-14300 (第2/6题) Time Cost00:00
收藏
该题平均耗时:2m18s,平均正确率:60% 添加做题笔记

There are recent reports of apparently drastic declines in amphibian populations and of extinctions of a number of the world’s endangered amphibian species. These declines, if real, may be signs of a general trend toward extinction, and many environmentalists have claimed that immediate environmental action is necessary to remedy this “amphibian crisis,” which, in

their view, is an indicator of general and catastrophic environmental degradation due to human activity.

To evaluate these claims, it is useful to make a preliminary distinction that is far too often ignored. A declining population should not be confused with an endangered one. An endangered population is always rare, almost always small, and, by definition, under constant threat of extinction even without a proximate cause in human activities. Its disappearance, however unfortunate, should come as no great surprise. Moreover, chance events—which may indicate nothing about the direction of trends in population size—may lead to its extinction. The probability of extinction due to such random factors depends on the population size and is independent of the prevailing direction of change in that size.

For biologists, population declines are potentially more worrisome than extinctions. Persistent declines, especially in large populations, indicate a changed ecological context. Even here, distinctions must again be made among declines that are only apparent (in the sense that they are part of habitual cycles or of normal fluctuations), declines that take a population to some lower but still acceptable level, and those that threaten extinction (e.g., by taking the number of individuals below the minimum viable population). Anecdotal reports of population decreases cannot distinguish among these possibilities, and some amphibian populations have shown strong fluctuations in the past.

It is indisputably true that there is simply not enough long-term scientific data on amphibian populations to enable researchers to identify real declines in amphibian populations. Many fairly common amphibian species declared all but extinct after severe declines in the 1950s and 1960s have subsequently recovered, and so might the apparently declining populations that have generated the current appearance of an amphibian crisis. Unfortunately, longterm data will not soon be forthcoming, and postponing environmental action while we wait for it may doom species and whole ecosystems to extinction.

【OG20-P446-571题】

It can be inferred from the passage that the author believes which of the following to be true of the environmentalists mentioned in highlight lines ?

  • 分析A选项
    xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • 分析B选项
    xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • 分析C选项
    xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • 分析D选项
    xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • 分析E选项
    xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
该题目由网友ztuwv提供。更多GMAT题目请

网友解析

当前版本由 感觉自己萌萌哒 更新于2015-11-03 11:06:42感谢由 感觉自己萌萌哒 对此题目的解答所做出的贡献。
题干:关于第一段中出现的environmentalists,作者最有可能同意的
定位:第一段中,关于environmentalists有2点,如果数量的减少是灭绝的信号,那么1 环保措施很重要 2 这个现象时由人类活动引起的
作者对1的态度在第4段,对 2 的态度在第2段
A They have wrongly chosen to focus on anecdotal reports rather than on the long-term data that are currently available concerning amphibians.
原文相反:第四段开头,there is simply not enough long-term scientific data,是对第三段结尾 anecdotal reports的回应,支持观点。没有涉及到wrongly chosen to focus on anecdotal reports
B Their recommendations are flawed because their research focuses too narrowly on a single category of animal species.
无涉及too narrowly on a single category of animal species.
C Their certainty that population declines in general are caused by environmental degradation is not warranted.
无涉及,原文中作者对population declines没有提出质疑
D They have drawn premature conclusions concerning a crisis in amphibian populations from recent reports of declines.
对应第二段:A declining population should not be confused with an endangered one.
E They have overestimated the effects of chance events on trends in amphibian populations.
原文相反,文中是没有考虑,非overestimated


按钮 我有更好的解析
按钮 我有更好的解析

题目讨论 (如果对题目有任何的疑惑,欢迎在这里提出来,大家会帮你解答的哦~)
总回复图标 发表讨论

  • 用户头像

    161866lz

    作者是质疑数据不够充分支持结论,不是结论错误
    6楼  | 2019-09-01 19:18:47 回复
  • 用户头像

    Joyce L

    indicator 标志
    5楼  | 2019-08-04 01:30:28 回复
  • 用户头像

    Joyce L

    due to human activity,  not environmental degradation
    4楼  | 2018-06-02 12:04:57 回复
  • 用户头像

    轩娅

    an indicator ≠ caused by
    3楼  | 2017-12-22 20:57:15 回复
  • 用户头像

    pano

    原文说环境学家认为,种群数量下降暗示着人类活动造成环境退化,并没有说环境退化造成种群数量下降
    2楼  | 2017-10-07 19:10:56 回复
  • 用户头像

    sheng

    想请教一下C错在哪里。
    C的意思是说,环境学家认为数量的下降是由于环境恶化导致,这是不大对的
    根据作者的意图,应该是反对the dicline, is an indicator of general and catastrophic environmental degradation due to human activity的,不是应该和C的意思相一致吗?
    谢谢!
    1楼  | 2017-07-03 22:03:18 回复
    • 评论用户头像
      柠檬黄: 同问

      2017-08-29 11:17:42 回复

    • 评论用户头像
      may翠: 原文:decline是环境恶化的indicator,表明(indicate)了环境恶化;而C选项:decline是由环境恶化引起的。两个意思有很大的差异。

      2018-08-18 15:03:24 回复

    • 评论用户头像
      大白兔: 我觉得可能是说 population in general 错了

      2019-02-16 04:51:24 回复

    •  
    提交
    标题图

    微信公众号:LGclub

    微信图

    Lindy老师:2095453331

    二维码
    • 手机注册
    • 邮箱注册
    登录>







    关闭图标

    标题图

    • 图标

      知识库学习

      GMAT语法、逻辑、阅读、数学各单项备考知识点学习及测验
    • 图标

      在线做题

      包含GMAT各单项必考知识点题目、OG/PREP/GWD/雷哥讲义题目、难度650/680/700/730题库题目练习及题目解析
    • 图标

      在线模考

      语文套题/数学套题/全套仿真模考,包含GWD/PERP/精选模考等上百套套题模考
    • 图标

      在线测评

      适合5种不同基础的GMAT学员,测评后可自动出具分数报告及复习计划指导
    • 图标

      资料下载

      GMAT必备备考资料下载、鸡精下载、课程课件等免费下载
    • 图标

      课程学习

      注册会员后,可在GMAT课程区,选择免费直播课程及公开课程进行在线学习
    ×
    请你选择你要查看的模考成绩单
    立即开通 暂不开通
    加载图片
    网络异常