建议使用官方纸质指南,查看对照完整题目
Jacob Burckhardt’s view that Renaissance European women “stood on a footing of perfect equality” with Renaissance men has been repeatedly cited by feminist scholars as a prelude to their presentation of rich historical evidence of women’s inequality. In striking contrast to Burckhardt, Joan Kelly in her famous 1977 essay, “Did Women Have a Renaissance?” argued that the Renaissance was a period of economic and social decline for women relative both to Renaissance men and to medieval women. Recently, however, a significant trend among feminist scholars has entailed a rejection of both Kelly’s dark vision of the Renaissance and Burckhardt’s rosy one. Many recent works by these scholars stress the ways in which differences among Renaissance women—especially in terms of social status and religion—work to complicate the kinds of generalizations both Burckhardt and Kelly made on the basis of their observations about upper-class Italian women.
The trend is also evident, however, in works focusing on those middle- and upper-class European women whose ability to write gives them disproportionate representation in the historical record. Such women were, simply by virtue of their literacy, members of a tiny minority of the population, so it is risky to take their descriptions of their experiences as typical of “female experience” in any general sense. Tina Krontiris, for example, in her fascinating study of six Renaissance women writers, does tend at times to conflate “women” and “women writers,” assuming that women’s gender, irrespective of other social differences, including literacy, allows us to view women as a homogeneous social group and make that group an object of analysis. Nonetheless, Krontiris makes a significant contribution to the field and is representative of those authors who offer what might be called a cautiously optimistic assessment of Renaissance women’s achievements, although she also stresses the social obstacles Renaissance women faced when they sought to raise their “oppositional voices.” Krontiris is concerned to show women intentionally negotiating some power for themselves (at least in the realm of public discourse) against potentially constraining ideologies, but in her sober and thoughtful concluding remarks, she suggests that such verbal opposition to cultural stereotypes was highly circumscribed; women seldom attacked the basic assumptions in the ideologies that oppressed them.
【OG20-P457-602题】
The author of the passage implies that the women studied by Krontiris are unusual in which of the following ways?
文中提到:Tina Krontiris, for example, in her fascinating study of six Renaissance women writers, does tend at times to conflate “women” and“women writers,”,K研究的这些女性是literate。
A They faced obstacles less formidable than those faced by other Renaissance women.
无涉及2者关于obstacles比较
B They have been seen by historians as more interesting than other Renaissance women.
无涉及到historian对着两类女性兴趣的比较
C They were more concerned about recording history accurately than were other Renaissance women.
recording history accurately无涉及
D Their perceptions are more likely to be accessible to historians than are those of most other Renaissance women.
K记忆的女性是作家,是受过literate,可以记录自己经历,被保存下来,被更多,的historian所知道
E Their concerns are likely to be of greater interest to feminist scholars than are the ideas of most other Renaissance women.
Their concerns are likely to be of greater interest to feminist scholars无涉及
ABCE都没有提到,D选项对应原文中说女性literacy让他们在历史记录中有一定比例。
European women whose ability to write gives them disproportionate representation in the historical record. 什么叫不成比例呢?经典的二八原则,这就导致了研究者们的一种错觉:能识文断字的女性就是所有的女性,原文又说 so it is risky to take their descriptions of their experiences as typical of “female experience” in any general sense. 这可不兴瞎概括啊,乱说话有风险 D选项的意思就是这些懂文笔的女性能够把作品留下来,给历史学家研究借鉴,虽然本文historians只字未提 不选E的原因就是更大的兴趣,这里的对比暗含了:那,是不是那些不能识文断字的女性也有一些看法呢?本文没有明说,就不选
D选项在原文中的依据:European women whose ability to write gives them disproportionate representation in the historical record.
The trend is also evident, however, in works focusing on those middle- and upper-class European women (whose ability to write gives them disproportionate representation in the historical record.) 既然问了这些女人是什么人,那就要从第一次提到这些女人的地方开始读,就是这句话,其中括号内说的是“写作能力让她们代不成比例地代表了大多数在历史记录中”--意思就是只有她们会写字,只有会写字的人才能在历史中留下痕迹,引起注意。
蒙对了,因为其他四个直接判错了····
TK的内容前面“in works focusing on those middle- and upper-class European women whose ability to write gives them disproportionate representation in the historical record.”说明当时中上流社会的女性因为会写字,就使得她们写的东西在历史记录上占了很大的比例-现在研究当时的历史,很多时候都只能看这些不具有代表性的女性写的东西-TK的研究就是基于其中6个女性作家
蒙对就算了,别瞎说好吗
不是吧,阿sir,读懂都不容易了,没必要还绕个弯了吧
这细节。。。。真尼玛细,服了
allows us to view women as a homogeneous social group and make that group an object of analysis.
服解释
定位前一句,TK是"works focusing on those middle- and upper-class European women whose ability to write gives them disproportionate representation in the historical record"作家的例子,可见她的研究对象的特殊性就是会写作,在历史上出现更多,找同义改写的选项,选D
文章问的是Krontiris的不同之处,定位到原文Tina Krontiris, for example, in her fascinating study of six Renaissance women writers, does tend at times to conflate “women” and “women writers,...前文提到了历史记载的女人具体的社会身份很难概括,随后引出Kroniris这个人很特别地把不同身份地位的女人合并成一个单一的社会群体作为研究的目标。
A 文章提到the social obstacles Renaissance women faced,但并没有和Kroniris的作比较
B 文章没有提到哪个更interesting
C 文章没有提到accurate的问题
D 对于历史学家来说研究更方便了,正是原文for example这句话后面的意思
E 和B选项同义,原文都没有提到
科目:
阅读RC
来源:
OG17新题
2m21s
平均耗时
53.4%
平均正确率
该题由网友b7vytaw提供 上传GMAT题