中间图

Or

题库搜索>句子改错SC-8853

句子改错SC-8853 【难度:680-700】 Time Cost
收藏
报告题目错误
请选择错误类型:
请描述一下这个错误:

取消

建议使用官方纸质指南,查看对照完整题目

Officials at the United States Mint believe that the Sacagawea dollar coin will be used more as a substitute for four quarters rather than for the dollar bill because its weight, only 8.1 grams, is far less than four quarters, which weigh 5.67 grams each.

  • 分析A选项 分析选校图标
    xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • 分析B选项 分析选校图标
    xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • 分析C选项 分析选校图标
    xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • 分析D选项 分析选校图标
    xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • 分析E选项 分析选校图标
    xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
暂无雷哥网文字解析
当前版本由 雷哥的司机 更新于2021-11-26 13:52:11 感谢由 雷哥的司机 对此题目的解答所做出的贡献。
manhattan forum:A) more as a substitute for four quarters [i]rather than for the dollar bill because its weight, only 8.1 grams, is far less than[/i] 
-This choice lack parallelism and is unidiomatic (more for X rather than for Y is incorrect). The correct comparison is more for X than for Y.
B) more as a substitute for four quarters than the dollar bill because it weighs only 8.1 grams, far lighter than
-By eliminating the "for" prior to "the dollar bill," This choice creates an ambiguity: Is the dollar coin being used more as a substitute for four quarter than for the dollar bill, or is the dollar coin being used more than the dollar bill as a substitute for four quarters?
C) as a substitute for four quarters more than for the dollar bill because it weighs only 8.1 grams, far less than
-CORRECT
D) as a substitute for four quarters more than the dollar bill because its weight of only 8.1 grams is far lighter than it is for
--By eliminating the "for" prior to "the dollar bill," This choice creates an ambiguity: Is the dollar coin being used more as a substitute for four quarter than for the dollar bill, or is the dollar coin being used more than the dollar bill as a substitute for four quarters? Additionally, the pronoun "it" is ambiguous and the "it is" construction is awkward.
E) as a substitute more for four quarters rather than for the dollar bill because its weight, only 8.1 grams, is far less than it is for
--This choice lack parallelism and is unidiomatic (more for X rather than for Y is incorrect). The correct comparison is more for X than for Y. Additionally, the pronoun "it" is ambiguous and the "it is" construction is awkward.

题目讨论 (18条评论)

用户头像
提交
  • 用户头像

    680461elv

    B项的平行不工整,有可能是substitute和four quarter。
    0 0 回复 2022-08-07 18:06:23
  • 用户头像

    318020xvjq

    我也觉得是这样
    0 0 回复 2021-05-08 20:45:57
  • 用户头像

    ALLAN FERRARA

    考点是比较的平行
    0 0 回复 2020-11-17 09:22:23
  • 用户头像

    靓女啊

    grams明明是可数名词
    0 0 回复 2020-11-06 14:06:13
    • 评论用户头像

      leon小恶魔回复靓女啊

      比较对象是four quarter 和bill, 而不是他们的重量,所以用less。我也没看清做错了。。。

      0 0 回复 2022-03-29 11:49:45

  • 用户头像

    leon小恶魔

    because 后面的it没有指代模糊存在吗?
    0 0 回复 2020-10-27 10:29:42
  • 用户头像

    166604ct

    bd主要错误是比较对象的平行问题,少了for
    1 0 回复 2020-10-06 20:34:12
  • 用户头像

    一只新鲜烤鸭

    如果只谈修饰weigh这一点,是不能用lighter只能用less吗
    0 0 回复 2020-08-18 10:08:07
  • 用户头像

    Lllllllla

    我感觉是这样的...lighter是形容词,所以是修饰it,ok;less可以是副词,修饰weigh,也ok。BD的错误在于the dollar,比较对象有歧义。
    1 0 回复 2019-11-08 12:11:32
  • 用户头像

    橙汁儿

    B可以比较主语也可以比较宾语
    0 0 回复 2018-05-23 14:51:04
  • 用户头像

    默默

    D不对应
    0 0 回复 2018-05-10 01:30:17
  • 用户头像

    fuksurgen

    我明白了 是weighs less 不是weighs lighter ,less 修饰的是weighs 不是前面的主语
    1 0 回复 2018-01-05 03:46:58
  • 用户头像

    fuksurgen

    C的less than用的不对吧?应该用lighter than吧?
    不能说 A比B less ,只能说A比B lighter ;或者说 A的重量比B的重量 less
    1 0 回复 2018-01-05 03:39:13
    • 评论用户头像

      小洛杀G回复fuksurgen

      我也这么觉得

      0 0 回复 2019-03-23 10:46:39

    • 评论用户头像

      昵称第28次回复fuksurgen

      666

      0 0 回复 2019-11-01 10:17:09

  • 用户头像

    xiaoyi

    You can say "it weighs lighter than XYZ" --just like you can say "I weigh heavier than him." ---But when you begin with the form "its weight is" then you should finish it off with "LESS THAN" rather than "LIGHTER THAN."
    0 0 回复 2017-08-19 13:06:31
  • 用户头像

    xiaoyi

    consider.
    both of these are correct sentences:
    1/ Sam has played hockey longer than baseball.
    2/ Sam has played hockey longer than Tommy.
    
    in each of the above sentences, there is NO ambiguity about the meaning.
    • baseball isn't a person, so it's impossible to read #1 in the same way as #2.
    • tommy isn't a sport/game, so it's impossible to read #2 in the same way as #1.
    
    __
    
    on the other hand, consider this sentence:
    Sam has known Sarah longer than Tommy.
    
    here, we can't tell what this sentence is saying.
    • it could work like #1 above—sam knows both sarah and tommy, but met sarah first.
    • it could work like #2 above—sam and tommy both know sarah, but sam met her first.
    it's impossible to tell.
    choice B in this problem has the same issue.
    0 0 回复 2017-08-19 13:00:09
  • 用户头像

    xiaoyi

    平行结构,比较,v>n
    0 0 回复 2017-08-19 12:59:31
题号选择

科目: 句子改错SC

  • 句子改错SC
  • 逻辑CR
  • 阅读RC
  • 数据充分DS
  • 问题求解PS
  • 综合推理IR

来源: 破解版07

  • 全部
  • OG20
  • OG20新题
  • OG19新题
  • OG18新题
  • OG18分册
  • OG17新题
  • OG16
  • OG12
  • 破解版12
  • 破解版08
  • 破解版07
  • GWD
  • 精选题库
  • OG18自测章
  • Manhattan
  • magoosh
  • 难题300
题目信息

2m9s

平均耗时

61%

平均正确率

  • 题目来源1:测评题

该题由网友sFTh7KS提供

点击上传
  • 手机注册
  • 邮箱注册
登录>







关闭图标

标题图

  • 图标

    知识库学习

    GMAT语法、逻辑、阅读、数学各单项备考知识点学习及测验
  • 图标

    在线做题

    包含GMAT各单项必考知识点题目、OG/PREP/GWD/雷哥讲义题目、难度650/680/700/730题库题目练习及题目解析
  • 图标

    在线模考

    语文套题/数学套题/全套仿真模考,包含GWD/PERP/精选模考等上百套套题模考
  • 图标

    在线测评

    适合5种不同基础的GMAT学员,测评后可自动出具分数报告及复习计划指导
  • 图标

    资料下载

    GMAT必备备考资料下载、鸡精下载、课程课件等免费下载
  • 图标

    课程学习

    注册会员后,可在GMAT课程区,选择免费直播课程及公开课程进行在线学习
×
请你选择你要查看的模考成绩单
立即开通 暂不开通
加载图片
网络异常