中间图

Or
句子改错SC-8882 【难度:600以下】 Time Cost00:00
收藏
报告题目错误
请选择错误类型:
请描述一下这个错误:

取消

It was only after Katharine Graham became publisher of The Washington Post in 1963 that it moved into the first rank of American newspapers, and it was under her command that the paper won high praise for its unrelenting reporting of the Watergate scandal.

  • 分析A选项 分析选校图标
    xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • 分析B选项 分析选校图标
    xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • 分析C选项 分析选校图标
    xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • 分析D选项 分析选校图标
    xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • 分析E选项 分析选校图标
    xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
该题平均耗时:2m52s ,平均正确率:45.2%。 该题由网友6zjTL提供。更多GMAT题目请

网友解析

当前版本由 kisenana 更新于2015-12-14 13:51:04 感谢由 kisenana 对此题目的解答所做出的贡献。

(A) 正确,由and连接的两个并列的强调句,注意此处两个并列结构中的it不是形式主语,而是强调结构中的it。

(B) Katharine Graham’s becoming不简洁;and连接的两个句子不平行

(C) 代词that只能指代名词,不能指代整个句子;having won high praise under her command修饰KG这个人错误

(D) 句子缺谓语

(E) Katharine Graham’s becoming的表达不简洁;句子重心变化



按钮 我有更好的解析
按钮 我有更好的解析

题目讨论 (如果对题目有任何的疑惑,欢迎在这里提出来,大家会帮你解答的哦~)
总回复图标 发表讨论

  • 用户头像

    Joyce L

    (It was) only after Katharine Graham became publisher of The Washington Post in 1963 (that) it moved into the first rank of American newspapers, 【and】 (it was) under her command (that) the paper won high praise for its unrelenting reporting of the Watergate scandal.
    目测两个强调句平行,供参考
    14楼  | 2019-07-25 05:15:24 回复
  • 用户头像

    Kath1230

    A  【It】 was only after Katharine Graham became publisher of The Washington Post in 1963 that 【it】 moved into the first rank of American newspapers, and 【it】 was under her command that the paper won high praise
    Katharine Graham's becoming选项中有这个’s becoming的都可以排除BE
    C中only after明显错误 D没有谓语动词
    13楼  | 2019-02-11 20:34:22 回复
  • 用户头像

    汪二喵

    放弃,不知道三个it.和一个its分别指什么,考试我也没空想
    12楼  | 2019-01-04 16:21:23 回复
  • 用户头像

    钟夫人

    the initial modifier in (e) is constructed with a present participle, "moving..." 
    if that's the case, then that implies that "moving" is contemporaneous with the main clause. it isn't, though; the modifier takes place distinctly before the action of the main clause.
    11楼  | 2018-09-25 14:44:33 回复
  • 用户头像

    钟夫人

    Ron:i'm of two conflicting minds in answering this sort of question, so i'll give you both sides of the issue.
    
    1)
    in this problem, you are definitely right in a certain sense: namely, the two clauses in choice (a) are much MORE parallel than are the clauses connected by "and" in the other two choices (b) and (c). (note that the word "and" is not present at all in the last two choices.)
    
    in general, the choice in which you notice the strongest parallelism is very likely to be correct.
    i know that this might sound like a statement of the obvious, but it really isn't: it's not unreasonable to think that they might include sentences that have perfect parallelism but other grammatical errors (which would therefore be incorrect), alongside choices with slightly worse parallelism but without those fatal errors.
    if those problems were to exist, and especially if they were common, then your criterion would become a lot less reliable. empirically, however, i just haven't noticed that many of those problems -- so, at the end of the day, your criterion is probably going to be fairly reliable.
    
    still, you definitely can't use that sort of thing as an absolute criterion. keep in mind the following:
    
    2) PARALLELISM DOESN'T HAVE TO BE PERFECT -- ESPECIALLY IF THE PARALLEL STRUCTURES ARE LONG
    if you have really short parallel structures, such as prepositional phrases, infinitives, or verbs, then it's reasonable to expect those structures to be perfectly parallel.
    however, you're going to have to allow for a little bit of variation between parallel structures that are very long. for instance, if entire clauses are placed in parallel, it's unreasonable to expect that those clauses should be structured in exactly the same way. 
    if you think about the way that language is structured, you should quickly come to the conclusion that this would be unreasonable.
    
    the upshot for this particular problem is that, although the parallelism in (a) is a bit more exact than that in (b) and (c) -- note that both sentences start with "it was" -- the latter two options are NOT incorrect based on parallelism alone. in those two choices, the word "and" still connects two clauses; it just happens that those clauses are constructed with a greater difference between them than in choice (a). the reasons that they are actually INCORRECT are other errors, not parallelism, in this case.
    still, your criterion is certainly not useless -- notice that if you guessed based on it, you would get this problem correct.
    
    also, just as importantly,
    3) if a parallel structure is present in some of the choices and completely absent from other choices, you can't eliminate the choices from which it is absent!
    the reason i'm saying this is because it appears that you actually got rid of (d) and (e) simply because they didn't contain the word "and".
    if that's the case, then you got really lucky -- you can't kill a choice just because it doesn't contain a particular structure.
    for instance, check out problem #36 in the FIRST edition verbal OG supplement (the prompt begins with "what was as remarkable..."; i can't reproduce it here). in that problem, a few of the choices have issues with nonparallel verbs, but the correct answer actually doesn't include the parallel verbs at all (one of the verbs is omitted entirely). if you were to use the same sort of reasoning on that problem, you would strike out the correct answer before even checking it out.
    10楼  | 2018-09-25 14:34:41 回复
  • 用户头像

    思豆

    A两个强调句并列。
    E重心和A不一样。==》没和原句保持一致。
    A有个问题是,出现三个it,有的是强调句的形式主语,有的是代词。我认为这个不妥,所以排除A选E
    之前不是要杜绝一个句子里it用途不一样嘛???
    9楼  | 2018-08-30 22:06:10 回复
    • 评论用户头像
      汪二喵: 同问

      2019-01-04 16:15:26 回复

    •  
  • 用户头像

    AdamWho

    同一句中,it反复出现是其必须指代同一个单数名词(they同理);A中还有一个it作形式主语,应去掉这个it重排语序。
    8楼  | 2018-08-30 14:05:30 回复
  • 用户头像

    苏利文的欧尼

    这个E句子重心怎么变了?E不是更简洁吗
    7楼  | 2018-04-04 11:01:31 回复
    • 评论用户头像
      默默: 因为主要是说主编,不是报纸,主语变了,强调主题变了

      2018-05-07 05:29:36 回复

    •  
  • 用户头像

    默默

    DE句子的重心发生改变
    6楼  | 2018-04-02 05:26:51 回复
    • 评论用户头像
      默默: And连接的句子也要平行

      2018-04-11 21:26:16 回复

    • 评论用户头像
      默默: 原句的次要部分变成了主语,是不对的

      2018-04-11 21:27:19 回复

    • 评论用户头像
      默默: 能用动词说的,就不要用动名词

      2018-05-10 01:32:54 回复

    •  
  • 用户头像

    jfghcf

    ,verbing的使用有限制条件
    一眼望去A比C安全
    5楼  | 2018-01-15 16:08:56 回复
提交
标题图

微信公众号:LGclub

微信图

Lindy老师:2095453331

二维码
  • 手机注册
  • 邮箱注册
登录>







关闭图标

标题图

  • 图标

    知识库学习

    GMAT语法、逻辑、阅读、数学各单项备考知识点学习及测验
  • 图标

    在线做题

    包含GMAT各单项必考知识点题目、OG/PREP/GWD/雷哥讲义题目、难度650/680/700/730题库题目练习及题目解析
  • 图标

    在线模考

    语文套题/数学套题/全套仿真模考,包含GWD/PERP/精选模考等上百套套题模考
  • 图标

    在线测评

    适合5种不同基础的GMAT学员,测评后可自动出具分数报告及复习计划指导
  • 图标

    资料下载

    GMAT必备备考资料下载、鸡精下载、课程课件等免费下载
  • 图标

    课程学习

    注册会员后,可在GMAT课程区,选择免费直播课程及公开课程进行在线学习
×
请你选择你要查看的模考成绩单
立即开通 暂不开通
加载图片
网络异常