中间图

Or

雷哥网GMAT>题库>OG16>阅读RC>9338

阅读RC-9338 (第1/11题) Time Cost00:00
收藏
报告题目错误
请选择错误类型:
请描述一下这个错误:

取消

建议使用官方纸质指南,查看对照完整题目

In Winters v. United States (1908), the Supreme Court held that the right to use waters flowing through or adjacent to the Fort Belknap Indian Reservation was reserved to American Indians by the treaty establishing the reservation. Although this treaty did not mention water rights, the Court ruled that the federal government, when it created the reservation, intended to deal fairly with American Indians by reserving for them the waters without which their lands would have been useless. Later decisions, citing Winters, established that courts can find federal rights to reserve water for particular purposes if (1) the land in question lies within an enclave under exclusive federal jurisdiction, (2) the land has been formally withdrawn from federal public lands—i.e., withdrawn from the stock of federal lands available for private use under federal land use laws—and set aside or reserved, and (3) the circumstances reveal the government intended to reserve water as well as land when establishing the reservation.

Some American Indian tribes have also established water rights through the courts based on their traditional diversion and use of certain waters prior to the United States’ acquisition of sovereignty. For example, the Rio Grande pueblos already existed when the United States acquired sovereignty over New Mexico in 1848. Although they at that time became part of the United States, the pueblo lands never formally constituted a part of federal public lands; in any event, no treaty, statute, or executive order has ever designated or withdrawn the pueblos from public lands as American Indian reservations. This fact, however, has not barred application of the Winters doctrine. What constitutes an American Indian reservation is a question of practice, not of legal definition, and the pueblos have always been treated as reservations by the United States. This pragmatic approach is buttressed by Arizona v. California (1963), wherein the Supreme Court indicated that the manner in which any type of federal reservation is created does not affect the application to it of the Winters doctrine. Therefore, the reserved water rights of Pueblo Indians have priority over other citizens’ water rights as of 1848, the year in which pueblos must be considered to have become reservations.

According to the passage, which of the following was true of the treaty establishing the Fort Belknap Indian Reservation?

  • 分析A选项
    xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • 分析B选项
    xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • 分析C选项
    xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • 分析D选项
    xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • 分析E选项
    xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
暂无雷哥网文字解析
当前版本由 Edward. 更新于2021-04-30 17:49:07 感谢由 Edward. 对此题目的解答所做出的贡献。

Treaty判定印第安人保留水权。在三种特殊情况下,联邦政府有水权。

印第安人确实拥有水权。

 

1. 细节题

定位第二句although部分



题目讨论 (4条评论)

用户头像
提交
  • 用户头像
    小爱奈

    Although this treaty did not mention water rights
    0 0 回复 2018-09-15 16:56:08
  • 用户头像
    xiaoyi

    federal land 和用水权的关系
    case 1 Winters v. United States (1908)中法院判决用水权,然后建立相应的规则federal land 
    case 2 Rio Grande pueblos,尽管没有契约说明是federal land ,但还是判决用水权了。因为 用水权是a question of practice, not of legal definition。上述规则的范围扩大了。
    case 3 Arizona v. California (1963)支持上述规则的扩大
    结论 the reserved water rights of Pueblo Indians have priority over other citizens’ water rights
    0 0 回复 2017-08-03 07:52:47
  • 用户头像
    Bink

    选项C的答案乱了:ourt a number of times. B It was rescinded by the federal government, an action that gave rise to the Winters case. C It cited American Indians’ traditional use of the land’s resources.
    0 0 回复 2017-02-20 11:48:29
    • 评论用户头像

      Zoa回复Bink

      ok

      0 0 回复 2017-07-15 12:08:34

    • 评论用户头像

      默默回复Bink

      最接近的那一句话

      0 0 回复 2018-05-17 07:17:22

  • 用户头像
    yanhairiluo113

    定位文章第1到10行,从文中此处的信息可知,该条约旨在保护贝克纳城堡印第安人的用水权,并且条约并未直接提及“用水权”
    A错误,文章未涉及该条约被质疑
    B错误,文章未提及该条约被废除
    C错误,文章未提及该条约引用了美国印第安人土地资源的传统用途
    D正确,文中的确提到了,该条约未直接使用“用水权”这样的字眼
    E错误,与第二段的Arizona v. California无关
    0 0 回复 2015-11-03 10:12:45
    题号选择

    科目: 阅读RC

    • 句子改错SC
    • 逻辑CR
    • 阅读RC
    • 数据充分DS
    • 问题求解PS
    • 综合推理IR

    来源: OG16

    • 全部
    • OG20
    • OG20新题
    • OG19新题
    • OG18新题
    • OG18分册
    • OG17新题
    • OG16
    • OG12
    • 破解版12
    • 破解版08
    • 破解版07
    • GWD
    • 精选题库
    • OG18自测章
    • Manhattan
    • magoosh
    • 难题300
    本题信息

    3m51s

    平均耗时

    58.5%

    平均正确率

    该题由网友XEcAgRHT提供 上传GMAT题

    • 手机注册
    • 邮箱注册
    登录>







    关闭图标

    标题图

    • 图标

      知识库学习

      GMAT语法、逻辑、阅读、数学各单项备考知识点学习及测验
    • 图标

      在线做题

      包含GMAT各单项必考知识点题目、OG/PREP/GWD/雷哥讲义题目、难度650/680/700/730题库题目练习及题目解析
    • 图标

      在线模考

      语文套题/数学套题/全套仿真模考,包含GWD/PERP/精选模考等上百套套题模考
    • 图标

      在线测评

      适合5种不同基础的GMAT学员,测评后可自动出具分数报告及复习计划指导
    • 图标

      资料下载

      GMAT必备备考资料下载、鸡精下载、课程课件等免费下载
    • 图标

      课程学习

      注册会员后,可在GMAT课程区,选择免费直播课程及公开课程进行在线学习
    ×
    请你选择你要查看的模考成绩单
    立即开通 暂不开通
    加载图片
    网络异常