中间图

Or
阅读RC-9356 (第2/7题) Time Cost00:00
收藏
该题平均耗时:2m52s,平均正确率:38.6% 添加做题笔记

建议使用官方纸质指南,查看对照完整题目

In Winters v. United States (1908), the Supreme Court held that the right to use waters flowing through or adjacent to the Fort Belknap Indian Reservation was reserved to American Indians by the treaty establishing the reservation. Although this treaty did not mention water rights, the Court ruled that the federal government, when it created the reservation, intended to deal fairly with American Indians by reserving for them the waters without which their lands would have been useless. Later decisions, citing Winters, established that courts can find federal rights to reserve water for particular purposes if (1) the land in question lies within an enclave under exclusive federal jurisdiction, (2) the land has been formally withdrawn from federal public lands—i.e., withdrawn from the stock of federal lands available for private use under federal land use laws—and set aside or reserved, and (3) the circumstances reveal the government intended to reserve water as well as land when establishing the reservation.

Some American Indian tribes have also established water rights through the courts based on their traditional diversion and use of certain waters prior to the United States’ acquisition of sovereignty. For example, the Rio Grande pueblos already existed when the United States acquired sovereignty over New Mexico in 1848. Although they at that time became part of the United States, the pueblo lands never formally constituted a part of federal public lands; in any event, no treaty, statute, or executive order has ever designated or withdrawn the pueblos from public lands as American Indian reservations. This fact, however, has not barred application of the Winters doctrine. What constitutes an American Indian reservation is a question of practice, not of legal definition, and the pueblos have always been treated as reservations by the United States. This pragmatic approach is buttressed by Arizona v. California (1963), wherein the Supreme Court indicated that the manner in which any type of federal reservation is created does not affect the application to it of the Winters doctrine. Therefore, the reserved water rights of Pueblo Indians have priority over other citizens’ water rights as of 1848, the year in which pueblos must be considered to have become reservations.

The passage suggests that, if the criteria discussed in highlight text were the only criteria for establishing a reservation’s water rights, which of the following would be true?

  • 分析A选项
    xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • 分析B选项
    xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • 分析C选项
    xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • 分析D选项
    xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • 分析E选项
    xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
暂无雷哥网文字解析
当前版本由 Edward. 更新于2021-04-30 17:49:29 感谢由 Edward. 对此题目的解答所做出的贡献。

Although they at that time became part of the United States, the pueblo lands never formally constituted a part of federal public lands; in any event, no treaty, statute,or executive order has ever designated or withdrawn the pueblos from public lands as American Indian reservations

A. FB是Winters法案中的,而Winters法案是criteria建立的前提,所以不冲突。

B. 和建立时间无关

C. RG从来没有被正式划为保留地,所以如果严格按照前文提到的标准,RG没有水权。

D. 无关

E. 无关



题目讨论 7条评论)

用户头像
提交
  • 用户头像
    Gika

    第二段第一句是also开头 说明第一段和第二段是两种标准 而RG属于第二种标准 如果只有第一种的话 第二种=RG就不成立了
    0 0 回复 2019-12-10 22:12:46
  • 用户头像
    卡西的毛球

    感觉高光部分和前后没有明确提及legal basis啊
    0 0 回复 2019-03-13 20:33:49
  • 用户头像
    默默

    看高光部分的前后
    0 0 回复 2018-05-17 07:27:35
    • 评论用户头像

      默默回复默默

      说到重点部分

      0 0 回复 2018-05-17 07:28:54

    • 评论用户头像

      是Emma呀回复默默

      兄弟 怎么哪题都能看到你???

      0 0 回复 2019-03-28 15:16:08

  • 用户头像
    黄一一

    enclave:飞地(指在本国境内的隶属另一国的一块领土)
    0 0 回复 2017-11-20 20:31:45
    • 评论用户头像

      默默回复黄一一

      B中的other 要小心

      0 0 回复 2018-05-17 07:22:00

  • 用户头像
    Zoa

    飞地,一种特殊的人文地理现象,指隶属于某一行政区管辖但不与本区毗连的土地。
    0 0 回复 2017-07-15 12:11:39
  • 用户头像
    xiaoyi

    Some American Indian tribes have also established water rights through the courts based on their traditional diversion and use of certain waters prior to the United States’ acquisition of sovereignty.
    
    (1) the land in question lies within an enclave under exclusive federal jurisdiction, (2) the land has been formally withdrawn from federal public lands
    0 0 回复 2017-02-05 14:57:03
  • 用户头像
    yanhairiluo113

    定位于文中的第10到20行,文章提到了三个标准:属于飞地;脱离联邦公共用地;意在保护水源以及土地,选择与文章内容最为接近的选项即可
    A错误,由于Fort Belknap印第安人保留地的建立依据的是Winters案,而第10行到20行提到的标准也引用了Winters案的判决结果,因此,Fort Belknap印第安人保留地的成立符合这一标准,拥有用水权,该选项说反了。
    B错误,与年份无关
    C正确,文章第二段第一句提到另外的两条标准:based on their traditional diversion and use of certain waters prior to the United States’ acquisition of sovereignty,随后作者举了Rio Grande pueblos的例子进行说明。因此,如果仅仅根据第一段的三个标准,那么Rio Grande pueblos的用水权就是没有法律基础的
    D错误,文中的的内容没有涉及reservations other than American Indian reservations
    E错误,与文中意思相反,因为文中的Winters案就没有明确提及用水权
    0 0 回复 2015-11-03 10:12:25
    本题信息

    2m52s

    平均耗时

    38.6%

    平均正确率

    该题由网友mGFvGeF提供 上传GMAT题

    • 手机注册
    • 邮箱注册
    登录>







    关闭图标

    标题图

    • 图标

      知识库学习

      GMAT语法、逻辑、阅读、数学各单项备考知识点学习及测验
    • 图标

      在线做题

      包含GMAT各单项必考知识点题目、OG/PREP/GWD/雷哥讲义题目、难度650/680/700/730题库题目练习及题目解析
    • 图标

      在线模考

      语文套题/数学套题/全套仿真模考,包含GWD/PERP/精选模考等上百套套题模考
    • 图标

      在线测评

      适合5种不同基础的GMAT学员,测评后可自动出具分数报告及复习计划指导
    • 图标

      资料下载

      GMAT必备备考资料下载、鸡精下载、课程课件等免费下载
    • 图标

      课程学习

      注册会员后,可在GMAT课程区,选择免费直播课程及公开课程进行在线学习
    ×
    请你选择你要查看的模考成绩单
    立即开通 暂不开通
    加载图片
    网络异常