建议使用官方纸质指南，查看对照完整题目
Two works published in 1984 demonstrate contrasting approaches to writing the history of United States women.Buel and Buel’s biography of Mary Fish (1736–1818) makes little effort to place her story in the context of recent historiography on women. Lebsock, meanwhile, attempts not only to write the history of women in one southern community, but also to redirect two decades of historiographical debate as to whether women gained or lost status in the nineteenth century as compared with the eighteenth century. Although both books offer the reader the opportunity to assess this controversy regarding women’s status, only Lebsock’s deals with it directly. She examines several different aspects of women’s status, helping to refine and resolve the issues. She concludes that while women gained autonomy in some areas, especially in the private sphere, they lost it in many aspects of the economic sphere. More importantly, she shows that the debate itself depends on frame of reference: in many respects, women lost power in relation to men, for example, as certain jobs (delivering babies, supervising schools) were taken over by men. Yet women also gained power in comparison with their previous status, owning a higher proportion of real estate, for example. In contrast, Buel and Buel’s biography provides ample raw material for questioning the myth, fostered by some historians, of a colonial golden age in the eighteenth century but does not give the reader much guidance in analyzing the controversy over women’s status.
我有更好的解析 
暂无雷哥网文字解析
主题题，本篇文章讨论了两部关于女性史学撰写的著作
A错误，本文并没有讨论争议的两个方面
B错误，本片文章没有质疑作者的方法
C错误，文章对两位作者的作品都进行了论述
D正确，符合原文意思
E错误，文中没有谈论一个普遍的观点
这解析和没解析一样，服了
1
0
回复
2022-09-13 19:08:15
A错误，本文并没有讨论争议的两个方面，sides错误
0
0
回复
2018-08-28 15:25:56
科目：
阅读RC
来源：
OG16
2m26s
平均耗时
88.7%
平均正确率
该题由网友XPhrxh4提供 上传GMAT题
分享
周末、晚班滚动开班 
24+35+35+6课时 
