【OG20-P441-557题】Which of the following, if true, would most clearly support the contention attributed to SPEW in highlight text?答案解析-雷哥GMAT

阅读RC-9450 (第2/6题) Time Cost00:00

报告题目错误

请选择错误类型：

请描述一下这个错误：

取消

建议使用官方纸质指南，查看对照完整题目

Acting on the recommendation of a British government committee investigating the high incidence in white lead factories of illness among employees, most of whom were women, the Home Secretary proposed in 1895 that Parliament enact legislation that would prohibit women from holding most jobs in white lead factories. Although the Women's Industrial Defence Committee (WIDC), formed in 1892 in response to earlier legislative attempts to restrict women's labor, did not discount the white lead trade's potential health dangers, it opposed the proposal, viewing it as yet another instance of limiting women's work opportunities.

Also opposing the proposal was the Society for Promoting the Employment of Women (SPEW), which attempted to challenge it by investigating the causes of illness in white lead factories. SPEW contended, and WIDC concurred, that controllable conditions in such factories were responsible for the development of lead poisoning. SPEW provided convincing evidence that lead poisoning could be avoided if workers were careful and clean and if already extant workplace safety regulations were stringently enforced. However, the Women's Trade Union League (WTUL), which had ceased in the late 1880's to oppose restrictions on women's labor, supported the eventually enacted proposal, in part because safety regulations were generally not being enforced in white lead factories, where there were no unions (and little prospect of any) to pressure employers to comply with safety regulations.

【OG20-P441-557题】

Which of the following, if true, would most clearly support the contention attributed to SPEW in highlight text?

A

Those white lead factories that most strongly enforced regulations concerning worker safety and hygiene had the lowest incidences of lead poisoning among employees. 分析A选项
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

B

The incidence of lead poisoning was much higher among women who worked in white lead factories than among women who worked in other types of factories. 分析B选项
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

C

There were many household sources of lead that could have contributed to the incidence of lead poisoning among women who also worked outside the home in the late nineteenth century. 分析C选项
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

D

White lead factories were more stringent than were certain other types of factories in their enforcement of workplace safety regulations. 分析D选项
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

E

Even brief exposure to the conditions typically found in white lead factories could cause lead poisoning among factory workers. 分析E选项
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

网友解析

我有更好的解析

暂无雷哥网文字解析

当前版本由 ya**** 更新于2015-11-07 09:16:05 感谢由 ya**** 对此题目的解答所做出的贡献。

逻辑支持题，由文中信息可知SPEW的推理过程是：原本可控但却失控的工作条件，导致了工人铅中毒。另外SPEW也提出如果满足某些条件（工人们更仔细、更清洁，安全条例更严格地执行），铅中毒可以避免，选择表示类似意思的选项即可
A正确，支持了SPEW立场，即严格执行安全条例的工厂，铅中毒事件发生几率低。
B错误，SPEW未涉及other types of factories
C错误，SPEW未涉及household sources of lead
D错误，SPEW认为就因为白铅工厂的安全条例未得到严格执行，才导致了铅中毒。但是该选项意思相反
E错误，SPEW未提及brief exposure to the conditions

题目讨论（6条评论）

提交

Kayla J.

细节题要看定位句上下文，后面有对定位句的进一步解释，所以答案在下一句。

0 0 回复 2021-07-30 21:57:53
Edward.

1. 推断题
A. 正确
B. 没有提到安全控制
C. 削弱
D. 削弱
E. 没有提到安全控制

0 0 回复 2021-05-21 16:40:40
432442ba

文段中划了高亮的句子，但不能只看高亮句子，因为后面有对controllable conditions的解释说明，你光盯着controllable conditions看是看不出所以然的

1 0 回复 2019-10-09 21:46:12
浪逐曲奇

文章结构梳理： WIDC did not count dangers, opposed. SPEW 也opposed。两者都反对上面的规定。（细节是SPEW 有evidence，现在我发现这个地方不重要，没必要看）但 WTUL 支持。

0 0 回复 2019-08-24 18:58:27
浪逐曲奇

自己的错因分析：我看到A时就觉得同其他选项相比，只有它反映了题目要问的，但当时看到lowest最高级，有点犹豫，以为是个错误选项特征【无语】，最终没选。错选了D，因为我不认识stringent这个单词，以为它是“顽固”，就是以为这个选项的意思是“该种工厂比其他工厂，在实施安规上更顽固，更不情愿。”但实际上，是说该种工厂在贯彻安规上更彻底，意思相反。

0 0 回复 2019-08-24 18:56:31
杀鸡大业

Also opposing the proposal was the Society for Promoting the Employment of Women (SPEW), which attempted to challenge it by investigating the causes of illness in white lead factories. SPEW contended, and WIDC concurred, that controllable conditions in such factories were responsible for the development of lead poisoning. SPEW provided convincing evidence that lead poisoning could be avoided if workers were careful and clean and if already extant workplace safety regulations were stringently enforced. 长长的定位，理解意思后发现和A一致。

0 0 回复 2017-10-06 19:55:50