建议使用官方纸质指南，查看对照完整题目
Acting on the recommendation of a British government committee investigating the high incidence in white lead factories of illness among employees, most of whom were women, the Home Secretary proposed in 1895 that Parliament enact legislation that would prohibit women from holding most jobs in white lead factories. Although the Women's Industrial Defence Committee (WIDC), formed in 1892 in response to earlier legislative attempts to restrict women's labor, did not discount the white lead trade's potential health dangers, it opposed the proposal, viewing it as yet another instance of limiting women's work opportunities.
Also opposing the proposal was the Society for Promoting the Employment of Women (SPEW), which attempted to challenge it by investigating the causes of illness in white lead factories. SPEW contended, and WIDC concurred, that controllable conditions in such factories were responsible for the development of lead poisoning. SPEW provided convincing evidence that lead poisoning could be avoided if workers were careful and clean and if already extant workplace safety regulations were stringently enforced. However, the Women's Trade Union League (WTUL), which had ceased in the late 1880's to oppose restrictions on women's labor, supported the eventually enacted proposal, in part because safety regulations were generally not being enforced in white lead factories, where there were no unions (and little prospect of any) to pressure employers to comply with safety regulations.
我有更好的解析 
暂无雷哥网文字解析
A.presenting various groups' views of the motives of those proposing certain legislation（介绍各组织对于提议立法的动机的观点，文中未涉及提议立法的动机，排除）
B.contrasting the reasoning of various groups concerning their positions on certain proposed legislation(比较各组织在立法提议上有关他们立场的论证，，符合原文内容，正确）
C.tracing the process whereby certain proposed legislation was eventually enacted（追溯...的过程，与原文内容不符，排除）
D.assessing the success of tactics adopted by various groups with respect to certain proposed legislation（评估...战略的成功，与原文内容不符，排除）
E.evaluating the arguments of various groups concerning certain proposed legislation（评价各组织关于立法提议的争论，文章只是列举三个组织的观点，并未评价，排除）
看到evaluate要谨慎
0
0
回复
2022-04-07 15:08:09
区别其实在于，A选项是motives of those proposing certain legislation，是他们去proposing法律；而B选项是positions on certain proposed legislation，是他们在评价已经proposed了的法律。
1
0
回复
2021-05-31 16:16:32
1. 主旨题
A. 没有列举所有机构的动机
B. 正确
C. 不是描述过程
D. 只有SPEW采取了策略
没有评价观点，只是陈述观点
0
0
回复
2021-05-21 16:40:51
In E, when you say "evaluate," you present the positive and negative points of a certain topic.
0
0
回复
2021-01-23 02:20:18
evaluate 评价 整篇文章没有作者观点，全都是罗列别人的观点
0
0
回复
2020-11-16 15:31:48
evaluate 评价。
0
0
回复
2019-01-22 06:49:06
作者没有主观评价 evaluate就是主观评价，然后存在对立观点，可以用contrast
0
0
回复
2018-11-02 20:12:12
做一遍错一边，每次都选motive……
1
0
回复
2018-08-21 10:20:14
song777回复考到770不是梦
+1
0
0
回复
2018-12-11 18:03:40
Muyao回复考到770不是梦
+1
0
0
回复
2019-01-06 04:25:47
E的主要问题在于这个动词evaluate，作者并没有evaluate什么东西，只是在展示各种观点而已
0
0
回复
2018-02-17 18:39:52
E 文中没有评估，评价 evaluate
0
0
回复
2017-10-30 20:23:00
主题题，本文主要描述了三个组织对于同一项提议的不同立场并分析背后的原因 A错误，本文没有谈及“某项立法方案提议背后的动机” B正确，符合文章主要内容 C错误，文中没有提及“某项法律提议的最终实施过程” D错误，文章未涉及the success of tactics E错误，作者没有进行太多评论
0
0
回复
2015-11-07 09:17:08
定位于文章第2句和末句，从文中信息可以看出，这两个组织对于该项提议的态度截然不同：WIDC反对而WTUL支持，各自的理由有所不同 A错误，文章未提及该信息 B错误，WIDC未涉及工会 C错误，该选项将WIDC的理由与SPEW的理由混淆了 D错误，与文章内容不符 E正确，说出了两个组织的不同态度
0
1
回复
2015-11-07 09:14:56
科目：
阅读RC
来源：
OG16
1m39s
平均耗时
50.5%
平均正确率
该题由网友1K6TDWf提供 上传GMAT题
分享
周末、晚班滚动开班 
24+35+35+6课时 
